this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
827 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
4781 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As of this week, half of the states in the U.S. are under restrictive age verification laws that require adults to hand over their biometric and personal identification to access legal porn.

Missouri became the 25th state to enact its own age verification law on Sunday. As it’s done in multiple other states, Pornhub and its network of sister sites—some of the largest adult content platforms in the world—pulled service in Missouri, replacing their homepages with a video of performer Cherie DeVille speaking about the privacy risks and chilling effects of age verification.

Archive: http://archive.today/uZB13

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm waiting for huge spike of trojan-infected computers from people trying to bypass the law by torrenting their porn from unknown sources.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t be surprised if they wind up hitting the very people who thought these laws were good in the first place.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those folks aren’t looking up “two adults having sex,” we’ve seen the contents of computers and it’s ALWAYS an R screaming about porn with 7 year olds in a folder on the desktop.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 131 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That will protect the children, for sure.

If I lived in the US, I'd be far more concerned about sending my kids to school but whatever.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also church. I wouldn't want them to get diddled by a pastor.

[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Sure, but that is more of a Christian church problem over a US one. There are plenty of cases where I'm from too, and also a few recent scandals with private Catholic school, so I'd tend to shit on the Vatican rather than the US on that particular one.

I just can't imagine thinking my children could get shot every time they go to school.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Avenging5@sh.itjust.works 10 points 22 hours ago

Freedom! Fuck yeah!

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 6 points 20 hours ago

Try reading it instead. Go old school. And while you're at it, write yourself and share it. Bring back the times of hand to hand banned knowledge sharing.

But now seriously: that is completely stupid.

As anyone considered the amount of money that "industry" generates. Considering the US is so economy driven and concerned with jobs, maybe that argument can raise concerns.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago

Don't forget to bring your copy of Chairman Trump's little thin-blue-line book when you leave the house, patriot! Otherwise the little 'murica-guards will get you!

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

For anyone curious, the privacy video is in their latest(?) blog post on their site. It should be viewable anywhere as it's outside the NSFW area and before the 18+ notice.

(Just bear in mind that while it should be SFW, it is still under a porn-site's domain.)

https://www.pornhub.com/blog/age-verification-in-the-news

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Keep this shit up and I'll have to go back to having sex with my wife.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 102 points 1 day ago (10 children)

We'll all have to go back to having sex with your wife

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 day ago

Any site that makes me do this immediately loses my traffic and I go to tor or a service that doesnt give a shit about us law.

[–] danhab99@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When I read about this I'm always brought back to the conversation of "internet as a public utility". I hope it's cool if we can take a tangent.

See unlike any of our other utilities like natural gas electricity water and sewage, the only thing that could potentially give any meaningful information about us is our sewage,, and the government already tests sewage for diseases. If we allow the government to "sell" us our internet they would basically be able to know everyone we are "talking too". Also how could we ever have enough regulatory oversight to protect everyone on the internet. Symmetrically if the government wants to have so much regulatory control over our internet it should maybe pay for it.

Like I wouldn't mind even paying another 50 bucks a month extra for "private internet" just so the government can have their free and regulated "public internet". Or would I (⁠・⁠–⁠・)⁠ゞ?

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Like I wouldn't mind even paying another 50 bucks a month extra for "private internet" just so the government can have their free and regulated "public internet".

That’s basically how cable TV started. Over-the-air TV stations were ad-supported and public broadcast was largely supported by public funds. Cable TV got off the ground by marketing itself as a commercial-free way to watch.

And then once everyone had switched to cable, they went “hey, why don’t we introduce commercials anyways? I bet people will keep paying for our service if we just gatekeep the media that people have gotten hooked on…” And that’s exactly what happened. They pivoted away from the “commercial free TV” sales pitch, and moved towards “gatekeep media and force people to pay for it” model instead.

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every benefit goes to providers, we get higher bills and they get subsidies

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No it doesn't. Mullvad costs less than 6 dollars per month: https://mullvad.net/en/pricing

[–] wooffersyt@lemmings.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Private Internet Access is less than $3/month.

[–] bramen49@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's almost like these reps want to have the same leverage over their constituents that Russia has on them...
.../s
.../?

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There is no sarcasm here. You are right. They'd love that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Haha not if you use a VPN or international websites or pirate that shit.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The problem is that these kinds of laws are becoming widespread. When they become the norm, simply VPN’ing to a different country won’t save you, because there won’t be any “safe” countries.

Shit like this is why I unironically considered spinning up a NSFW Jellyfin instance. At least if I save the degen content like a data hoarder, they can’t legislate away my access.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kamikazerusher@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Some states have already begun to require sites to detect connections from VPNs and block them.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/11/lawmakers-want-ban-vpns-and-they-have-no-idea-what-theyre-doing

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you VPN into the UK or Australia, you'll run into the same restrictions.

As more countries pass this kind of legislation, VPNs become less and less of a solution, and they were only ever a solution for people who can afford them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drspectr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

they are going after vpn next, there are several states talking about that. Considering that microsoft is working on their super ai windows, we can bet they are gonna be reporting everything you do to big brother.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I'm going back to physical media. Guess that will include my porn soon too.

Hmm, might actually still have some old playboy somewhere 🤔

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›