this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

4886 readers
525 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_A@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Court said the host has to :
1- pre-check posts (i.e. do general monitoring)
2- know who the posting user is (i.e. no anonymous speech)
3- try to make sure the posts don’t get copied by third parties (um, like web search engines??)
Basically, all three of those are effectively impossible.

in my opinion : #3 effectively seems impossible, #2 is contrary to Lemmy's philosophy and #1 would require a lot of community supervision ... that would require a different Lemmy software.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago

1 is impossible. You cannot screen every message sent, even screening every post would be a full time 24/7 job (3x full time moderators working in shifts).

The big platforms will run it through a blackbox content moderator system, and lobby to keep fines minimal. Lemmy would be screwed.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are the implications for fediverse software hosted in the EU?

[–] misk@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No new impact, because the ruling is about online marketplaces, which pre-scan / moderate every new posting anyway due to multiple legal obligations that exist already. TechCrunch analysis says that the ruling is too broad and applies out of this context but I don’t see it there and the case they’re making isn’t very solid. I think they recognise this as an attack on how ad industry works because checking if the ad is legal before allowing it would be a huge boon to societies worldwide, but also an enormous cost for companies selling ad-spaces.