No Stupid Questions

I don't think so. As far as I'm aware, it's never come up before. The way it would play out, I think, would be something like...

• Future president issues an EO or whatever rescinding the pardon. This doesn't really accomplish anything, though. It's really just a signal to the DoJ that the president proooobably wants them to pursue charges against the individual in question. Which they've probably already discussed directly.
• DoJ brings charges against the individual.
• The individual, files a motion for dismissal of charges, on the grounds of the prior pardon.
• The judge hears arguments from the DoJ about why that pardon should be considered invalid, and rules one way or the other. If I had to guess, I'd say most judges would rule that the existing pardon can't be overturned, as it's a power defined explicitly in the Constitution, and overturning pardon's isn't.
• Regardless of the ruling, the decision gets appealed and escalated through the appeals court system to work out the final outcome.

No. The power of the pardon is explicitly granted to the President in the text of the Constitution, and it provides no mechanism for reversing such pardons. It’s meant to be a check against unjust laws and/or corrupt courts, and presidents who would corruptly abuse the power for their own profit are supposed to be removed from office via impeachment—but as we’ve seen, Congress won’t even remove a president who orchestrates a mob attack against themselves as part of a scheme to overthrow an election.

I'm pretty sure that to re-incarcerate someone after they were pardoned would require a new trial, which would violate the double jeopardy clause.

No, once pardoned, they're pardoned. The thing about the people that he's pardoned is that they are sociopaths, and they will offend again. There's nothing stopping authorities from monitoring those people closely, and giving them the maximum sentence on something else.

OJ beat the rap on murder, but he still spent the better part of a decade in jail for something else, because he had no benefit of the doubt from society, so that's something.

Just OJ these criminals.

Using traditional logic and precedent: no.

In the context of the brave new world we find ourselves in, in which the Tribunal of Six have given the president effective carte blanche to do pretty much anything so long as it’s “an official act” (where an “official act” is defined, as far as I can tell, by the president saying “this is an official act”): lots of things, including

• siccing one of the various spec ops teams from the Do~~D~~W or DoJ on them
• declaring open season on said person, including a bounty and guaranteed presidential pardon
• inviting them to a meeting and then shooting them in the face
• etc

Seriously, it’s anyone’s guess at this point. The bones of the system are crumbling, and many have already been shattered, likely irreversibly. The only thing holding this shitshow up at this point are load-bearing posters.

Nope. Trump is out to do as much irreparable damage as he can to own the Libz and there’s shit tons of nothing that a lot of people are willing to do about.

Nope. Otherwise Nixon would have been unpardoned by Carter.

Theoretically a constitutional amendment could be passed. That would require 3/4 of states to ratify it.

The whole point of a pardon is "we know you did the crime, but don't think you should be punished." It can only come about if there's an ulterior motive, like corruption or if you agree to work with the government towards their goals, initially working on dangerous projects etc. Allowing it to be overturned later would undermine that as it wouldn't make the danger worth it.

I don't know, but I would be fine if the presidential pardon was abolished. Perhaps replace it with only a stay of execution.

Yes, US Supreme court says the president can order Seal teams to do stuff (if you know what I mean 😏)

Just hope the next president has a spine

The president has no business undermining the judiciary in the first place.

No. A pardon is a perfect legal exemption for a crime.

If there's still enough left of America to function after trump is done, I imagine the new government will come up with all kinds of new ways to undo a previous corrupt and disastrous presidency.