this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
740 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
3933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Waterfox, Ironfox, Librewolf

[–] arararagi@ani.social 5 points 10 hours ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

compare to vivaldi flat out refusing ai, keeping mv2, and actually building a blocker and tracker into the browser.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 12 hours ago

Yeah this ain't it chief. Hope we can nuke the feature into oblivion, but we all know that won't be possible as Firefox enshittifies

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 16 points 13 hours ago (10 children)
[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Isn't servo what FF uses for rendering? I thought they had built that layer from scratch in Rust.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Since everyone is mentioning browsers, what should we use on mobile now? Tor isn't really a option, since most sites won't let you access them by it.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago

Firefox, Firefox Focus, Fennec, IronFox.

Plenty of choice for different needs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 14 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Well, older news is: "Firefox has evolved into the first thing I uninstall when I install Fedora, or any other Linux distro for that matter". Since the first mention of their so-called "anonymous telemetry" I began to actively avoid them. Like someone else mention, thank God for Librewolf, Mullvad and Brave (with Leo disabled).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gtr@programming.dev 44 points 16 hours ago
[–] Fokeu@lemmy.zip 24 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Thank god for librewolf, they fix most of the new Mozilla bullshit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Has anyone tried Mullvad Browser and would care to comment on their experience comparing to LibreFox, WaterFox, Floorp, Zen etc. ?

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

It's pretty bland, but it's meant to be. It's main function is to be the second most fingerprint resistant and private browser. It's second is the ability to use Mullvad VPN tunnels per tab or domain.

Besides that, it is not recommended that you use it for logging in to sites or for personalized use cases. If you add extensions like a password manager for said logging in, you fingerprint yourself.

Honestly, I'm going to be blunt, I think it is great for light scrolling and some media consumption, but I don't see its use case. It is faster than Tor and so if you find it filling a need where you might not need Tor, great! Otherwise, I don't really see its appeal.

If I really want to blend in, I'll use Tor, and otherwise I enjoy having my browser customized to my needs. Floorp is my daily driver, and I know I'm super fingerprintable using it. I just don't care for the things I'm looking up and the fact that I have ad blockers and other privacy features set up.

Mullvad doesn't have vertical tabs, it is lacking web apps, it doesn't include much customization, and its settings are really sparse. You can of course go to about::config and change whatever you want (as long as the browser has it, so not vertical tabs), but then you defeat the purpose of them having limited options: to hide your fingerprint a little less than Tor but much more than other browsers

All this to say, it's a good browser and I am sure there are others who have found much more use out of it than I have, but it's not a daily driver for me.

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

That makes sense. Not all browsers are meant to be daily drivers. It sounds like it would be good for certain use cases. Thank you for sharing in detail.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 33 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

They're going to use AI to identify and block ads for me, right? Or let me set a cookie preference and automatically apply that to every page I visit?

That would be rather useful things to have AI for IMHO.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

So, AI will do the same thing as what light extensions already do, but consuming 4GB of RAM and maxing out CPU load?

[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 15 points 14 hours ago

Well no. They not gonna burn ai credits on that, they need it to identify your interests and sell you ads.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›