this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
330 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

77925 readers
2276 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Follow up video from MegaLag on the Honey scandal.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago

Me watching this entire damning exposé start to finish despite never having used Honey or run a small business online.

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

He talks about how honey gets access to the codes by scraping every promo code submitted by the users. Doesn't that mean that someone could automate something to submit false codes by the 100s whenever you are at checkout to fill PayPal with junk data? Making honey useless for everyone for that merchant because it can't tell the real from the fake. An anti honey extension.

What's PayPal going to do? Try to sue because the data they are illegally obtaining is being tainted? Obviously the codes wouldn't work on merchants so they are fine in this.

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is basically already what my experience with honey was. Most of the codes didn''t work.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Honestly thats my experience with most codes, in general.

Which is why those deal sites that give you codes are ultimately pointless, especially since they started making super specifically regional codes and other excessively extreme limitations that render it useless for everyone but one random guy that lives in a blue barn to the north east of a pig farm.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Oh, another MegaLag video about the honey situation.

Last time this happened, LTT had a psychotic meltdown and sic'd his base on GamersNexus for...reasons?

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 108 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I hate this thumbnail image.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 48 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That alone is enough for me to not watch it.

[–] Noja@sopuli.xyz 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The thumbnail is satire, the video is from the person who originally exposed the PayPal Honey scam.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Right? It tickles something in the back of my brain that just makes me angry. I can't really explain it. By all accounts, it's a good video, but I just can't get over the thumbnail.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean it has Mr. Beast's AI-generated face with that disturbing grimace he always has and those creepy fake veneers.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's Mr Beast? I've never watched anything of his, so I don't know what he actually looks like. If this is one of his standard video thumbnails I now understand why people hate them/him so much!

[–] artyom@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

I mean yes and no. It looks like a AI-generated image of Mr.Beast. Which is what he uses in all his thumbnails because he shills his AI image generation site.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

It resembles him, that is more or less what he looks like, but it feels incorrect to say an AI generated image is an image of him. Before AI, all his thumbnails included him making stupid faces like this (because it was very effective). Now he, and everyone else, just uses AI images resembling him making stupid faces (because it is unfortunately still somehow effective)

The social media algorithms have turned most people's brain attention pathways into mush. Sometimes people get a shovel and a mop and start trying to dig their way through properly, but a lot of times they don't get very far before it starts seeming impossible to make useful progress. It's usually easier to just swim in the slop.

[–] Zeddex@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking exactly that. Like is that really his face or is this GenAI? It has to be GenAI right?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Either that or just terrible Photoshop. Seems to be what everyone is doing these days is just cartoonish Photoshop with bright colors for some reason.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

I don’t watch any videos with these stupid faces and I hate when someone I follow suddenly starts doing it. ಠ_ಠ

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't choose it (not my video).

I'd encourage you to watch it anyway, if you can get past the trauma...

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"trauma" is not the point here

The point is that all YouTube videos now have these extremely annoying clickbait thumbnails and titles and that is not a good thing

[–] 46_and_2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I hate them too, but that style of thumbnail has been a major YT thing for like a decade. Avoid them like the plague, myself, and even mark them as "not interested", "don't recommend channel" for the more annoying ones. Probably ain't much of an impact, but at least teaching the algo what not to show me.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm gonna have to hide this post because it's really creeping me out. It's not even his video right? No way I'm clicking on that.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, it's not my video, and it's not like I chose the thumbnail.

I'll just say folks, this has left me with a "people just like to complain" vibes.

The video is excellent, and exposing how the internet is the wild west of companies lying, cheating and stealing.

Maybe you could engage with that, rather than the creator having to make a stupid thumbnail to keep the algorithm happy.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I know it's not your video, I meant it's not the creator's face on the thumbnail, sorry about that. I really can't stand the thumbnail and I can't give the click especially for a topic I don't really care about. Honey sucks. I learned that a while ago.

That being said, thank you very much for sharing the video.

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 70 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Finally! I was getting concerned with how long this was taking but see it was well worth the wait.

Somehow even worse than I ever imagined, and there's still more to come.

I know we're all jaded nerds on this corner of the internet that are well aware of "if you're not paying, etc. etc." but there's real value in investigations like this. Just look at how massively damaging and long-running this scam has been. The future of cyber security and cyberwarfare can't just be fought on tech knowledge alone, there's a huge social component to it and a "You should've known; I told you so" attitude won't help.

Spread the information and reach out to those closest to you to offer sincere and genuine help. Help your friends, family, and coworkers uninstall these extensions and all extensions like them. I feel like we're really coming to a point where all these tech industries have overextended themselves to a point where they are immensely vulnerable. Capitalism demands line always go up and if we can even slightly slow or possibly reverse that trend it could pop the bubble for a lot of these corporations.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago

I know we’re all jaded nerds on this corner of the internet that are well aware of “if you’re not paying, etc. etc.” but there’s real value in investigations like this.

I think especially because this investigation unearths the business models of predatory companies like these. It shows that these are not isolated incidents, and that this is the process by which corporate giants become giants. If there's anything to be jaded at, it's that late stage capitalism is moving closer and closer to the state of anarchocapitalism as time passes. These practices are so embedded, there's literal instruction guides in every corporate marketing department on how to circumvent consumer protection laws... assuming the consumer protection "agencies" aren't just working to protect the corps interests from lawsuits in the first place.

People need to know these things.

[–] other_cat@piefed.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Feels like a historical rhyme to all the toolbars people would install into their browsers, only now it's extensions.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I know we're all jaded nerds on this corner of the internet that are well aware of "if you're not paying, etc. etc."

Haven't watched this video but IIRC the real scandal was that the extension would change the cookie to identify Honey as your referrer so the content creators whose referral you actually used didn't get paid. No matter how jaded you are, you can see that as the theft it is

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's even worse than all that. The video is worth a watch if you have the time, he gets his hands on the leaked source code via accidental exposure on the Apple store, but then also covers other extensions that exhibit this same behavior as well as Microsoft Edge that just has it built into the browser. That's right, even Microsoft is getting in on this by having their baseline browser without any extensions hijack the affiliate codes. It's all so brazen ...

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I definitely will, I liked the last one! I just wanted to clear up what the scandal was - it wasn't something anyone could think creators should have seen coming

[–] madjo@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The new video showcases how Honey extorted small stores into becoming a paying affiliate with Honey in order to be able to keep certain discounts out of Honey's database.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Another thing even the most cynical person can easily see is extortion!

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

That was in the previous video

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I agree with most of it, but......

If you (a business) want to give out coupons only "internally" (usually only to employees), allowing ANYONE to redeem them is just stupid. That system is designed to be exploited. IMO, this is either a bug or very bad application planning.


And I have an idea for a "honey trap trap".... Whenever someone tries to redeem an "internal" coupon code in your shop, do this: If the person is employee, let them redeem it. If not, display "Attention! You have a dangerous spyware called Honey on your PC. Please uninstall it as soon as possible" with a link to this video...

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, Honey is just exacerbating the inherent flaws in the system, and most of it can be dealt with having a limit of coupon usage and expiration of the coupons.

The thing which really upset me is advertisers pulling money from podcasts which have referral codes because of abuse from Honey. I'm not a fan of advertisements, but the referal codes were a simple solution since there's no way to accurately measure if an ad was listened to. Honey causing advertisers to pull support for podcasts just pushes podcasts to closed ecosystems with more tracking and analytics, and takes money away from Podcasters.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To elaborate on this, since watching this video I've paid attention to how sponsorships provide discounts to viewers of creators, and it's often via URLs. eg. service.com/creator_name, not with a discount code. That way, a website can track how many people went to the URL, not how many used whatever code is associated with that URL.

As an additional blocking measure, maybe a website could simply create a different listing for the same product instead of relying on discount codes, this different listing only being accessible via the creator links. I'm not sure if Honey would figure out how to navigate that as well or not, swapping the item in the cart or whatever.

I'd totally be interested to hear more on how companies deal with this, and if there are better ideas than the one I came up with as I typed this comment.

To elaborate on this, since watching this video I’ve paid attention to how sponsorships provide discounts to viewers of creators, and it’s often via URLs. eg. service.com/creator_name, not with a discount code. That way, a website can track how many people went to the URL, not how many used whatever code is associated with that URL.

Part 3 of the video series will probably show how Honey f*cked that system up, too. 😄

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honey is a great example of corporate greed and enshittification turned to 11. It started as a simple free extension for collecting and trying discount coupons, and turned to a massive greedy scam with enough financial backing to start blackmailing webshops for profit.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's worse, is this was the plan all along

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 1 points 1 day ago

System working as intended.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe? I do kinda doubt that as the original addon was benign and did exactly what it said on the tin to fix a problem one of the founders had themselves - finding and applying coupons automatically, and there isn't an obvious way or need to monetise that.
But they gained a massive userbase very quickly, which attracted investors like vultures ready to tear profits from those users. So even if they originally didn't plan to do much more than scan for coupons, after a few years of venture capital greed and tens of millions of investor money, they definitely were chasing profits by any means necessary. Money corrupts, after all.

And by the time Paypal was willing to pay $4 billion for them in 2020, it was blatantly obvious they were doing a lot of shady shit because there just isn't a way to monetise free users that well while staying above the board.

All of which is a damn shame, because the idea of an addon that scans and tries coupons for you is really simple and very useful :/

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I thought honey disappeared like two years ago after some scandal.

[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is the continuation of that scandal, from the same creator who documented the initial incident.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

And boooyyyy did it get worse haha

[–] SweetCriticalPumpkin@reddthat.com 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

such an incredible video. very thorough deep dive further exposing the honey scam.

[–] Duranie@leminal.space 6 points 2 days ago

I really had no intention to start my day with a video, but here I am. Was worth it though.