this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
150 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

5078 readers
826 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reports of covert filming have prompted privacy fears as experts are concerned that the devices would be altered to ‘nudify’ women without their consent

Archived version: https://archive.is/20260102184736/https://www.thetimes.com/uk/technology-uk/article/smart-glasses-meta-ray-bans-video-zgc6rm7dc

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Not just women, but children too.

Also, recently a guy in Sweden was busted for using them to cheat during a written driver's license test.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, it is a threat to everyone

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah but some groups of people don't ever seem to matter.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's the ratio of male perverts covertly recording women to female perverts covertly recording men? Realistically, it's probably a hundred to one.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is that how you keep yourself from caring about some groups?

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No. But you're literally doing "all lives matter" here. A women's group pushes for change, and inevitably on any story about it, there will be a hoard of men not proposing how they can protect men, but whining about why the women's group doesn't worry about the men. You want to make progress on this issue for men? Start your own men's welfare group and be the change you want in the world. Don't just whine when a group advocates for themselves and their issues, and they just don't happen to include you in their target audience.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is no space in the conversation for some groups and that's by intent.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Why are people talking about their issues, why aren't they talking about ME?!!"

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

"Nobody else can talk if you don't shut up about yourself."

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How dumb do you have to be to need to cheat a drivers test....

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 10 points 1 week ago

You’d be surprised. We (Driving Theory Test UK) do not allow them into our test lab. They either test without them (locked away) or do not test.

Across our network of test centres there are usually a couple of attempts at cheating each day.

Such as tech assisted, like Meta glasses, or fake licences, or even impersonation.

Some people think it’s beyond them to learn and insist on cheating.

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Look I get all the legit reasons to dislike and distrust smart glasses, but I have always wanted an Iron Man-like HUD when looking around.

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just want subtitles in real life

[–] atropa@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry ,only outside the matrix

Actually, it's already a feature with some smart glasses. Like these:

https://www.wired.com/story/these-translating-ai-glasses-put-subtitles-on-the-world/

[–] Ofiuco@piefed.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Same, a navigator, indicator of the direction of the cars and the names of the streets... Maybe a to-do list too, that's all I want.

[–] sparkles@piefed.zip 24 points 1 week ago

Yeah it sucks. Did everything I could to stay off the internet when I was younger and understood this could happen eventually. I kept my kids off the internet entirely—no social media, no group photos with them uploaded, etc. But now some creep can just look in their direction and record them anyway. I know this is possible with phones as well, as I caught someone recording my youngest a few years back at great wolf lodge. It is just exhausting and it feels like there is no winning.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Meta pose a threat

[–] vetehinen@lethallava.land 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't deny these can cause privacy issues as does the ubiquity of small devices with high quality cameras in general but I don't think this law professor really understands the tech very well if she's worried about "nudification" in connection to these.

There's nothing in particular about smartglasses that would enable such a use and they're considerably worse than a regular phone for that in every regard except for the covert picture taking. They completely lack the displays and processing power needed for it unlike, say, a phone.

@technology@lemmy.zip

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

There’s nothing in particular about smartglasses that would enable such a use and they’re considerably worse than a regular phone for that in every regard except for the covert picture taking.

"Except for the one thing everyone is concerned about, they're harmless."

[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

What a load of bollocks. Grok is doing this on X today, why do you think these glasses couldn't be doing that with some programming?

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 3 points 1 week ago

Its ok to punch someone wearing these. Its your duty to stop being friends with anyone who bought them.