When you consider that the Democrats' job is to offer only token resistance and lose elections, you realize he's doing his "job" very well.
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
168 points (92.0% liked)
No Stupid Questions
45251 readers
828 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
His job is to lose and stall when instructed to by nazis, and he is a goddamn genius at doing it (though a dumbass for failing to see how dumb it is to do that)
Point is, he's doing his job: losing.
Are we talking about Chuck Schumer or Mike Johnson?
The problem is simple. Congress and Senate treat their job like jobs. Not sworn duties.
At the end of the day they don't give a damn about the USA and will always accept checks from special interest.
politicians are the least accountable poeple in Murica (probably in the continent)
What mechanism would you suggest be used to change that?
The Democrats are cowards and fucking terrible politicians. They’re also owned by big money as much as the Republicans.
The entire US Congress except like 4 people needs to fucking go. Not just Schumer.
That's a fair point. Almost seems like a two-party system is fundamentally flawed.
Yeah it’s part of the problem. I think it’s exacerbated by the fact that the US basically legalized bribery with Citizens United.
Fairness doctrine being abolished was the end of America.
It’s one bullet point on a long list that got us here. Installing a Christian nationalist dictatorship has been the right’s goal for 50+ years.
People give the fairness doctrine too much credit; First it’s partially responsible for the current mentality of all opinions matter no matter how stupid. But more importantly it only ever applied to broadcast TV and Radio, not cable or satellite, or the Internet. So it never would have applied to Fox News, for instance.
It's not a silver bullet, but it was a very useful way to ensure people didn't become radicalized by just listening to one side lie constantly. There's a reason why Reagan and Nixon wanted it gone, and we're living through the repercussions of not having it now; radicalized far right extremists everywhere and in control of the government. Also, we could have made updates to expand it or introduce new legislation to curb extremism on other platforms.
Definitely far from perfect but better than our current reality.
On the contrary, lots of people were radicalized by hearing people like new age healers given the same airtime as medical doctors.
It’s taken 20 years to fail at making the publicly funded internet a utility. The purpose of the doctrine was to govern publicly owned airwaves. I strongly believe it would have been and is impossible to expand the FCCs jurisdiction to include privately owned networks. I also strongly believe that the current administration would abuse the fuck out of these regulations.
Yet here we are, with some people believing vaccines cause autism and the far right extremists to boot. I personally would've taken more idiots harming themselves with their new age junk than what we got.
Don't misunderstand, I agree it absolutely wouldn't have been a catch all and even in its time it lacked the teeth to do much but at least it was something. It combined with a stronger education system could've prevented a lot of what we're dealing with now.
More legalized. Lobbying was already legalized bribery. Citizens United was just them making sure they get to pick who they bribe.
And also allowed them to bribe anonymously, don't forget that very important part.
I think it's not even the fundamental flaws that make it so bad (they could theoretically be worked-around or fixed), I think at some point the system was captured by a group that to this day ensures both parties remain ineffectual and operate towards the same war goals.
Saying "the whole thing is a pantomine" seems like a lazy throwaway remark from some stranger you meet at a bar or your disillusioned uncle, and yet it's exactly the conclusion you have to come to. We are controlled by the illusion of democracy and illusion of own influence
load more comments
(4 replies)
The simplest explanation is that the oligarchs have assured him he'll continue getting his salary if he continues being ineffective.
because the capitalists like him there
Fun fact Chuck Schumer doesn't even pretend that he works in favor of his Democratic constituents. No Chuck Schumer's entire career is based off of serving the needs of the Baileys. A fictional couple he invented that he bases all of his ideals rhetoric and legislation around. They are Republican. Look this up if you never heard before it's the weirdest fucking thing.
Oh yeah, Baileys are the imaginary friends I was referring to. Thanks for reminding me!
His job is U.S. Senator, which he holds because he received the most votes from the state of New York. “Senate Minority Leader” is a position he holds because no one else wants it. It’s not a Constitutional position, like Speaker of the House or President of the Senate, and the U.S. Senate is a house of equals. Being “minority leader”bestows no added power, only responsibility for representing his party when negotiating with the other party. If another Senate Democrat wants to be responsible for negotiating with a senile man-child, they can call for a vote whenever the minority caucus meets.
And like Pelosi, he received the most votes from the state of New York because, "That's our guy!" We gotta fight these people where they live.
Mitch McConnell had the game down pat. He'd campaign like hell in Kentucky, be damned what the rest of the US thought of him. He's shaken the hands of 10s of thousands of little old ladies who say, "That Mitch sure is a nice man!" (got that last bit from an article about how he worked his campaigns, not making it up)
Jesus, if lemmy only knew about Orrin Hatch or Robert Byrd (KKK member!). 🙄 Those dirtbags lasted for decade after decade after decade by appealing to their constituents, not the US as a whole.
Former House Speaker Tip O'Neill: "All politics is local."
Side note, Mamdani has this game figured out! Except he went out and listened to his voters, of all sorts. Fascinating man to watch. No talking points shoe-horned in as replies, no sound bites, legitimate listening skills and answers. Bill Clinton was such a master. We will watch his career with great interest!
load more comments
(5 replies)
The fact of the matter is that if Democrats had been elected, there would have been no invasion of Venezuela, nor Iraq two decades ago.
Let us not kid ourselves. Non-voting eligible American voters let trump take the reins again, with control of Congress and the Supreme Court, knowing he could pull shit like this at any moment, yet still sat on their lazy asses TWO Election Days, fondling their purity, bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL, and now they're like... "C'mon Schumer... dazzle me and my most excellent purity over here!"
Elections have huge consequences, so spare us the righteous outrage. Whatever blood gets spilled, it's also on those soft, tender, lily-white hands of non-voting deadweights.
Also, twice is a pattern: "Vote for a woman?!! Me?!! When PIGS FLY!!!"
There hasn't been a single war that the DNC hasn't been bloodthirsty to get into. Iraq was bipartisan and Biden expanded the bounty on Maduro to $25m. House Democrats just gave $8b more in funding than what was requested for war.
Correct. Instead, dems would have declined to roll back any of those laws "so we have something to campaign on next time" until voters get fed up with their ineffectiveness and vote R next time. THEN, we get the invasions.
It's easier to complain and blame the "other" instead of the actual people doing the deed, it seems. I am so sick of the generation of people who like to say that all "blank" are the same - instead of looking for something worth fighting/voting for. Nuance takes time and paying attention takes away from the fun things. Local politics is easier to discern which of the parties is actually governing, so the least that can be done is voting for the party in your local elections that actually falls parallel to your values (or is the closest) - but again, it's easier to just complain than to actually do something about it.
Biden increased sanctions on Venezuela.
During the Venezuelan election, when the US-backed opposition leader said that he wouldn't give the oilfields back to the US, Biden had their financial support cut off and arrested opposition members living in the US.
The Venezuelan policy is bipartisan.
It’s pretty simple really he gets money from Israel and the oligarchs to pretend he’s opposed to things in the weakest and least convincing way possible. He’s doing a good job at the job of pretending to be opposed to facism while preventing any movement left so he continues to get paid to do that.
This is, sadly, how it seems to be. Both he and Hakeem Jeffries seem to obstruct real opposition from the Democratic Party against Trump and the Right in any meaningful way.
It's every democrat since Clinton and every Republican since Reagan. Carter was the last real president this country had.
Think of it like a ratchet mechanism. He's not there to move things left, he's there to keep things in place while the right takes a little break to twist up the tension even more.
That's how the left works in the US now: They're not actually there to create change or movement, they just hold the place and keep things from moving until the right can get back in power. They don't do anything but act as a placeholder for real change - they hold their position until the right puts their screws into things again and twists us further to the right.
It's...ridiculously obvious once you notice it.
They're the party of the status quo. They'll probably take 50 years to reinstate the rights lost by this administration.
I can alreadyhear them now. "We need something to campaign on next time." As though doing your fucking job isn't something you can campaign on.
.. because he was elected.
Major chunks of the country will always vote for the same party. That's why you hear talk about blue states and red states. He's in a safe area, so he has a negligible chance of losing even if he does a terrible job.
How does/did Schumer, Grassley, Graham, Pelosi, McConnell, Feinstein, and so on, stay in power? I always get downvoted and naysayed when I say this, but American voters fucking suck. Just the absolute worst. People will blame the two party system, and they do have a point there, but those same people don't show up in the primaries to make a difference. They're too scared to vote for change, as they've shown over and over. Just a bunch of ignorant, self-satisfied, cowards.
We did show up to the primaries enough to make a difference in 2016. We voted for Bernie Sanders as our candidate. The DNC told us all to go fuck ourselves, they're a private institution, they can do whatever they want, the votes are just a formality, and appointed Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate instead.
Please, tell me more about how it's fault of the voters.
Ah, I thought that Hillary ended up getting more votes. I must be wrong. I'm in no way denying the fuckery that went along with it, from the DNC to media doing everythign they could to keep Bernie out, but in the end, voters are the ones who vote. Tell me again about how it's not ultimately the voters. And most tellingly, we weren't discussing the presidency, which is a whole bag of issues, but Congressional representation. Fucking voters 100%.
AFAIK he was OK during Trump's first term, back then it was Pelosi holding back.
Now he is making the same mistakes Pelosi did.
Mistakes, yes. Unintentional, no.
His leadership position was voted on before the DNC chair.
So his threats to cut off funding to the state of any Dems that wouldn't back him still had some teeth.
It doesn't now, mainly because the DNC immediately jumped into the largest twin esture into state parties, ever.
He's been a lame duck all but maybe a month of this senate leadership term, and will almost certainly lose it next year.
If he doesn't, it's a bad sign.
Gerrymandering criminals.
The Baileys' votes each count as 100,000+ votes
view more: next ›