this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
66 points (94.6% liked)

The Deprogram

1847 readers
165 users here now

"As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say that we're tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We also know that when the people understand, they cannot but follow us. In any case, we, the people, have no enemies when it comes to peoples. Our only enemies are the imperialist regimes and organizations." Thomas Sankara, 1985


International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, a Slav and an Arab.


Rules:

  1. No capitalist apologia / anti-communism.
  2. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  3. Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome; this includes a warning against uncritical sectarianism.
  4. No porn or sexually explicit content (even if marked NSFW).
  5. No right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc).
  6. Use c/mutual_aid for mutual aid requests.

Resources:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The billionaires are just showpieces and do not have any real authority in the economy unlike in the free market economy in a liberal democracy.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 2 months ago (2 children)

China is just following the same plan with billionaires as they are with carbon, and they've already passed peak billionaire; next milestone: become billionaire-neutral by 2050.

[–] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 29 points 2 months ago

De-billionairing the economy is part of the transition to green energy.

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 months ago
[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The most succinct, easily defensible retort I have is "you can become a billionaire in China, but billionaires in China can't buy the government."

[–] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 months ago

Jokes on you, they would just say that this graph is a sign of Chinese economy collapsing!

[–] pcalau12i@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 months ago

What critics of China often don't understand is that China had a two-step development strategy put forward by Deng Xiaoping where the first step would involve getting wealthy as fast as possible at all costs (because they were afraid the country would be overthrown if they remained poor for too long) and then the second step would be to then use the immense wealth to start repairing problems caused by the first step and achieve a more balanced model of development.

The CPC only acknowledged that they entered the second stage in 2000, and so they needed to shift to start correcting for problems created from the first stage like environmental degradation and mass wealth inequality, and inequality between city and countryside. But economies have momentum, so it takes time to really notice changes, so we would expect these problems to continue to get worse for some time then finally reverse.

The GINI index peaked in 2010 and started to finally come back down. Total wealth inequality has been going down for awhile despite number of billionaires rising, although that has finally started to go down recently as well. Inequality between town and country started to decline in 2008. Of course, I am sure many people already know about the drastic environmental improvements.

People like to point to things not being perfect now and insisting therefore it cannot get better, and they ignore that these things have been getting better for awhile now.

[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

That's because those were Uyghurs/s

[–] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Best line go down. Cants wait for it to be back to 0.

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Peak billionaire era / s lol :kelly:

[–] Verenand@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Genuine: can i get the source? so that i could use that statistic in arguments