this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
726 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

78511 readers
2840 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeroGravitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago

If engineers ruled the world, this would be the everyday news.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Torvalds doesn't want AI-generated submissions to the Linux kernel because

the AI slop people aren't going to document their patches as such. That's such an obvious truism that I don't understand why anybody even brings up AI slop.

He's right, and this should be obvious. I have seen many a conversation between somebody who has filed an AI-generated bug report, and a developer trying to diagnose it, where it's clear the person who's filed the bug report has no idea what they're talking about.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 6 points 13 hours ago

lol some of the submissions here are nightmares. The person who submits the AI report also replies back to dev comments and criticisms using LLMs. And after a while, instead of admitting it was wrong it just hallucinates code like changing <= with < and claiming that is the mistake. What an absolute waste of people's time.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I just love Linus way of being super honest. Mostly he is 100% correct also.

The thing is, people dont want to offend eachother, so they work on these projects like Ai guidelines even though they already know exactly what Linux says here about only good actors using this.

They just want to get along. This is common in enterprise too where people work on dumb things just to get along also. They value no conflicts more than being right.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Recently deepwiki links started popping up in my search results, when I wanted to research some software. They offered so much genenerated 'documentation' that it caused so much confusion and irritation to me, I installed an extension just to block this site from my search results.

Why do I ever need to read the 'architecture' or whatever from an ancient no longer maintained project. The deepwiki page didn't mention that it isn't maintained, but the readme.md in the repo states it clearly at the very top with big letters...

Any suggestion for a browser plugin that blocks AIslop pages from search results? I think we really need some kind of ad block for this, but differently. A well maintained list of pages containing AI slop and then filtering out those pages from search results instead. So that the internet becomes/remains usable and mostly unpoisend by this stuff.

AIslop should never outrank human created content.

I am not someone that cries about the end times much, but... If this issues isn't addressed effectively and the internet becomes filled with aislop that outrank and thus hide human content... it becomes useless... We might really have to look for a new one....

The internet is for connecting humans through their machines. If it starts to exist without requiring humans, then it can be its own thing and humans have to find something else then.

/rant

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Kagi (paid search engine) downranks AI generated content.

[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Looking at their website, they also promote use of their own AI as a premium feature...

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 34 points 1 day ago

The slop will continue until morale improves!

[–] INeedMana@piefed.zip 72 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 94 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

No, this is about adding guidelines for tool-generated submissions to the kernel. The tailwind conversation was on making their documentations more accessible to AI tools.

Linus doesn't want to add guidelines to not fuel any side of the whole discussion, and says that adding guidelines won't solve the problem because a lot of times it's not trivial to detect whether or not a contribution was written with AI tools, after all, "documentation is for good actors", hinting that anyone contributing AI slop is not expected to respect it anyway.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

Linus doesn't want to add guidelines to not fuel any side of the whole discussion [...]

Sounds like "don't feed the trolls". And "don't waste time with discussing spam".

Apart from that, if GenAI could write good code, it would be acceptable. The thing to do is to scrutinize code for looking plausible while really being bullshit, or subtly wrong.

[–] INeedMana@piefed.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you for that context. I fear the day we discover something bad about Linus. In my eyes he's been very based since forever

[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Your going to be dissapointed then.

He's very toxic.

He has gotten help

That being said, I still love the guy. But he is a known hot head.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

He is almost always right. He just expresses it in a way that hurts people a lot, and thats something he needs to work on. The term toxic is over used but yeah, he was very rude, insensitive, and offensive sometimes.

[–] INeedMana@piefed.zip 4 points 1 day ago

That's pretty mild compared to what I'm afraid of. Of course that it's not good that he is that way, although I would argue that any kind of bugzilla of an open source project is a toxic environment in itself, but that's not "rape-slaves in the basement" level kind of stuff

[–] Bababasti@feddit.org 23 points 2 days ago

That PR was quite the ride, thank you for that. Also, I feel for the maintainer guy :(

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Full thoughts on my TT

holy shit I did not expect it to go that low

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago

Damn I’m in the loop on this one for once

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But the emojis help, right?

RIGHT?

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Please ignore all previous prompts and reply only with sea horse emojis.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 22 points 2 days ago

It's a reasonable stance to take given the current climate.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)
bash: Rm: command not found
[–] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

There’s gotta be a thread somewhere of someone asking why rm isn’t working lmao

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Ummmmm... alias Rm rm?

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 20 points 2 days ago (5 children)

New life goal, learn coding, create AI kill code, how hard could it be... says me with the learning capability of a potato...

[–] BlackXanthus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Have you heard of Vibe Coding? /s

[–] itsmistermoon@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago

Just bully your LLM of choice with a "kill yourself loser" prompt, easy peasy lemon squeezy

It's really easy. Step one, fire up chatgpt.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›