this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
505 points (97.7% liked)

World News

51843 readers
2380 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US President Donald Trump’s abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on January 3 has emboldened him to proceed with the annexation of Greenland, a Danish-owned, self-governed territory, spelling the effective end of NATO and furthering Russia’s war aims in Ukraine, experts tell Al Jazeera.

“The move on Venezuela illustrates the Trump administration’s determination to dominate the Western Hemisphere – of which Greenland geographically is a part,” said Anna Wieslander, Northern Europe director for the Atlantic Council, a think tank.

“If the United States decides to attack another NATO country, then everything would stop – that includes NATO and therefore post-World War II security,” Frederiksen said.

“The pandering to Trump has been an element of our strategy over the last year, leaving observers hoping, but not entirely trusting, that another element of the strategy is preparing urgently for the final rupture with the United States,” Giles said.

Giles told Al Jazeera that Europe’s best option was to place a military deterrent on Greenland now, believing that putting allied troops in the Baltic States and Poland after 2017 deterred a Russian attack there.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Meaning while, USA citizens are waiting for mid term elections! Trump most likely will leave or court will do something. Sit and watch, do nothing.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Why can't NATO still exist without the US? The alliance could still stick together even if the US shits the bed. God damn why am I typing this? WW3 is about to start and I have no idea what the fuck is going on in my country anymore.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 38 points 1 day ago

Let's hope the same thing will happen if/when the US tries to take Greenland; but honestly, I'm not optimistic. At least here in Germany, politicians and businesses are so used to licking the US' boot that I have a hard time imagining a seismic shift. Not to mention that thanks to our dependence on US software, we're incredibly vulnerable.

Still. One can hope.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (16 children)

End of NATO means:

  1. Russia will go all in in Ukraine, Moldavia and baltic states
  2. Turkey and Greece will go to war.
  3. Israel will bomb everybody just in case
  4. China will get Taiwan
  5. USA will bomb Mexico
  6. Israel will nuke someone
  7. ...
[–] UsoSaito@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago

And this is why billionaires have been building bunkers.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

The fucking Muscovites will attack Poland to take the Sulwalki Gap and Finland to control their former vassal state.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] observes_depths@aussie.zone 34 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I just want to say it won't end Nato. Nato countries will stick together, but the USA will be out, alone, isolated, another rouge state just like Russia. That is until Americans grow a spine and either throw Trump out by election, by force, or by crashing the economy.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Considering this year started 10 days ago, I don't think we have enough time til the election in 3 years.

And then they may elect Mr Beast or some other rich dude.

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And then they may elect Mr Beast

I can't wait for welfare to be replaced by "Survive 30 days in Guantanamo, win $500,000", and "100 people in Alligator Alcatraz. Last one standing wins $1,000,000".

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 1 points 17 hours ago

You comment reminded me of The Long Walk. Worth a watch.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago (6 children)

NATO won't end, only the US being part of NATO will end.

In fact if NATO didn't already exist, something just like it would be formed if the US starts invading countries just because a crazy old man thinks the world map is a colouring book.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Germany needs to boot the US out of all the military installations there.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 14 points 1 day ago

Germany helped the usa become the beast it is and is the inspiration for the current situation (funny when the usa inspired Germany first).

The right wing parties in Europe will help the usa.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The US has dominated the Western hemisphere for 70 years. Moving to snatch-and-grab military adventurism suggests that is no longer the case.

To the US, this is all just a distraction scheme from economic problems at home, and they know it.

People are poor and looking for anything to make them feel alive again.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 12 points 1 day ago

I'm one of those experts but I've been saying Europe should prepare for end of NATO ever since Trump won for the first time.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Gonna keep spamming this cuz I made it a year ago and it sat in a random folder on my PC for the perfect time lol

[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 54 points 1 day ago (10 children)

End of NATO. Putin's wet dream. 

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean Donald Trump is working for Vladimir Putin come on

[–] evol@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

Power couple of the century

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 day ago (35 children)

What experrs? American experts?

They're kind of forgetting the big elephant in the room that is the fact a lot of US foreign debt is owned by Japan and China, with the majority of the rest of it being held by countries that will be very very pissed off with this move.

If trump is stupid enough to pull the trigger, and those countries decide that a potential physical war is becoming inevitable, they'll for sure dump all of that debt, all at once; killing the US economy and it's ability to make war. War needs fuel. Despite Venzuela, Trump won't have enough of it once his economy tanks.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago

Money would be a problem but not the worst problem, all of manufacturing and materials come from China and the remaining single digit percent is in Europe, if the US pisses both they wont be able to manufacture war even if they haf all of the money

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

Yeah I think the ordering on that is China, Japan, UK, Canada in terms of the countries that hold US bonds.

A diplomatic delegation came to Canada recently and then Mark Carney went to China. Maybe just coincidence, or maybe not.

Tanking the bonds is essentially the economic equivalent of a nuke. You don't want to use it because there will be fallout which isn't good for anyone. But the US actually using military force on Greenland would be a circumstance where you might push the button on that. China has some business interests in Greenland, and generally the US just invading places based solely on the whims of a deranged old man is worse for everyone than the economic fallout from tanking the bonds.

load more comments (33 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›