this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
91 points (97.9% liked)

World News

51843 readers
2322 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Israeli media reports and a hawkish US lawmaker signalled that Iran might be next on US President Donald Trump's list of interventions following the abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.

The Jerusalem Post reported on Monday that the US is weighing “some intervention” in Iran’s protests.

The article also said how Israel believes that the US’s abduction of Maduro over the weekend may indicate a new US risk threshold for intervention in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

The report follows an appearance by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham on Fox News in which he sported a “Make Iran Great Again” baseball hat, saying, “I pray and hope 2026 will be the year that we make Iran great again.”

The brazen US intervention in South America came just after Trump on Friday warned Iran that the US could intervene to "rescue" Iranians if they continue to be met with a harsh response from their government amid protests there.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 21 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

An Israeli intervention in Iran will end well. No way that can turn badly. None at all.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Good thing it’s not an Israeli Intervention but a US one (sarcasm)

[–] sundaymidnight@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They are H****r pupils yet, but Israelies don't want to see it (and I censor it for them)

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 points 18 hours ago

(For Zionists? No need to censor for them.)

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 13 points 21 hours ago

I don't get it. I thought the FIFA Peace Prize (or FAPP) standed for something....

What a disappointing turn of events, you can't any longer trust a fapp winner.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The Iranian people have already rebelling over time. Intervention may set that process back.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I'm afraid that's the point. The billionaire class wants to deploy Operation Sundial. We didn't build a single 10 Gigaton weapon that would guarantee that no humans could survive, the politicians were too scared to do that. We built 30,000 one megaton weapons that still might do that, but maybe the people in bunkers can survive.

[–] adhd_traco@piefed.social 11 points 22 hours ago

Without foreign interference and meddling all these countries in the Middle East would have long toppled their oppressors without funding controlled opposition and puppet policy makers.

Go liberate yourself US & Israel.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 0 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

I see two possibilities:

  • if the situation has become such that protesters are having armed exchanges with the regime, and losing them due to lacking control over airspace, lacking good enough communications or lacking armor - then foreign intervention may tilt the balance in their favour [this is currently not the case, to my understanding]

  • however, if they mostly aren't involved in armed struggle, but still trying to do mass movement / demonstrations / riots, then foreign attack offers a convenient excuse to declare martial law and use any flavour of weapon to kill them [this could be the case, to my understanding]

This presents a difficult situation: threatening the Iranian regime with foreign intervention to have it not shoot live ammo at the protesters, may help their cause. Unless it's already being shot, which I have a strong suspicion is happening.

However, moving to assist them may end up actually hurting them - and I'm not analyst enough to give conditions or a probability.

I don't think the ayatollah or his generals are sleeping in their ordinary bunkers. They're probably extra careful at this time and have already arranged the downward delegation of authority in case of attack.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Iran is massively holding back because of the Western propaganda storm to justify intervention already. They could have easily sent in the army to mow them all down.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 1 points 30 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

I think they recently stopped holding back. :(

Content warning: lots of dead people.

https://xcancel.com/Osint613/status/2010379811701850565

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

The Iranian government is already shooting live ammunition at its people, just like they did during the last round of major protests. They've already killed hundreds on the past couple days, under the fog of an internet blackout. Protestors are asking for international help.

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jan/10/iran-protesters-tell-of-brutal-police-response-deaths-and-forced-confessions

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

The rioters have AKs and are shooting at cops and buildings. They are also setting mosques buildings ablaze. It is hardly a "protest".

Also "calling for international help" can this bad attempt at a color revolution be any more obvious?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Any “protection” the current regime is liable to offer the protesters is going to be more akin to mafia “protection” than the traditional definition of the term.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago

Look, I don't trust the US or Israeli governments either, but I really feel for the Iranian protesters and many of them are already mourning. The faster this regime falls, the better.