this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
560 points (97.8% liked)

Not The Onion

20848 readers
1880 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Crossposted from https://feddit.uk/post/42584616

Trump also told the Times that he isn’t opposed to using nuclear force if he “needed it” to take over the Arctic island but that “it might upset NATO," since the island is a self-governing territory of NATO member country Denmark.

(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's honestly the best reason he has given for it so far.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

This might be the only true thing he's ever said.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 7 points 2 months ago

If that even made sense, it would be even more reason to deny him it.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

Someone throw some green-painted dirt on his face and tell him "Here's your greenland, now fuck off"

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago

At least he is honest...

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

So, he understands the concept of a safe space... But only for him? And only if it's... a country?

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Surely the intelligence agencies at work in sane countries are considering assassination operations, right? Isn’t this like the most worthy reason to attempt such a thing, threat of global annihilation?

[–] murvel@feddit.nu 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does MI6 have a plan to assassinate Trump? It would surprise me if they don't. Plan for all contingensies. But from plan to actual operation is a continental leap.

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago

Chinese and Russian agents keep intercepting them because they wanna see him do it

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Psycho for sure but totally illogical

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago

The US already has direct colonial control over NATO. NATO is fully committed to not let Russia invade Greenland or setup oil rigs off the coast, and it is absurd to suggest that Russia or China are patrolling Greenland or have any desire to attempt to take their resources without cooperation. But the US would get NATO's help for defense of Greenland, and NATO would permit greater US contribution to NATO command bases there, or obey orders to contribute more themselves.

Trump, in addition to repeating the false China/Russia threat, has admitted zero interest in Greenland's resources. They are too far away and extremely expensive to develop. This leaves only a single possible motive for needing US control over Greenland: The absolute certainty that EU will disobey US orders for greater submission and the need to directly threaten them from closer distance. There is no offensive missile threat to Russia provided by Greenland relative to other NATO territory.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›