290
First-In-Human Trial Of CRISPR Gene-Editing Therapy Safely Lowered Cholesterol, Triglycerides
(finance.yahoo.com)
Nerds will do anything not to go for a jog
this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
290 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
78705 readers
4177 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
to be fair, jogging is kinda the worst.
Nerd
We lowered your cholesterol. But you now have horns and crave the taste of human flesh.
I don't understand why you used "but", where it should clearly be "as well as"...
Anything not to eat less butter, huh?
With what "side" effects?
Rich people living longer
That is indeed a very heavy side effect and could potentially be a threat to human life on this planet.
Is this the first human trial, or just the first officially sanctioned one?
IIRC there was that one guy who experimented on himself and cured his lactose intolerance.
... found it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3FcbFqSoQY
Nearly 8 years ago.
I feel obligated to mention that he doesn't modify his own genes, he infects himself with a modified bacteria that produces lactase.
you can just eat yogurt to get the same results
First-in-human just means it's the first time that specific therapy is being tested on humans instead of animals (e.g. mice, dogs, monkeys), and the primary objective of the trial is to test that it's safe for use in humans. It doesn't refer to the concept of gene editing or lowering cholesterol.
was safe and reduced LDL cholesterol by nearly 50% and reduced triglycerides by about 55%
From the referenced article
What is the point of your comment?
Thought emporium?
Yep thought emporium.
~~But I think the Chinese scientist that experimented on babies did it few years before that even.~~ looks like same year, 2018, and thought emporium published first by 8 months
That paper is a wild read
Bring it on!!!
Autoimmune disease? GONE!
Acne? GONE!
Don't like your eye color? CHANGE IT!
For rich by rich, only rich get.
Now, sing with me: “Only in America…”
Thats not really true.
The US is an exception but generally, the cost of therapies becomes commercially viable with the passage of time.
For example, our 2 year old daughter just had her DNA profiled because she has a few manageable, yet ongoing developmental deficiencies. Her DNA markers will guide her treatment.
When I was a child this type of treatment was sci-fi, and when it was invented you could have said "by rich for rich" or whatever.
Despite my other comments, I suspect you are right.
Cost and price are two different things. Insulin is cheap to make but people die from not being able to afford the sticker price.
The US is an exception
.... In the US, yes
Not outside the US
Shit's going to get pretty weird imo. Hopefully it isn't used for eugenics purposes (it probably will be, let's be honest). I don't think that people should be able to change so many things that they become unrecognizable, but I can understand changing a few things per person, voluntarily, obviously.
I believe in bodily autonomy. People should be able to do whatever they want to their own body.
Allowed, sure, just don't think it's a good idea to completely change who you are. I want humans to be recognizable as such. I'm more worried about what parents will be doing to their children, that's where the eugenics shit becomes a problem. Getting rid of "undesirable" traits and whatnot.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)
view more: next ›