this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
442 points (96.6% liked)

Not The Onion

20776 readers
1077 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Midwives have been told about the benefits of “close relative marriage” in training documents that minimise the risks to couples’ children.

The documents claim “85 to 90 per cent of cousin couples do not have affected children” and warn staff that “close relative marriage is often stigmatised in England”, adding claims that “the associated genetic risks have been exaggerated”.

(page 3) 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gaja0@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

I think incest is icky and we should "aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population"

/s

I think these sorts of conversations are too nuanced for any politician to have, like the death penalty. They'd just use it to target people the right doesn't like.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Cousin marriage is a heavily exaggerated statistic. Unless it happens many generations in a row the genetic variation does not nearly reach anything representing sibling marriage.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Ban cousin marriage.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

This is maybe an unpopular opinion but I remain on team “stay the fuck out of other people’s business.” This fits soundly in the “other people’s business” category.

[–] AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth -5 points 1 month ago (19 children)

ITT: Blatant ableism disguised as concerns.

Should you be allowed to have children if you are a known carrier of some bad but not inmediatly deadly risk gene like fragile x, chorea huntington, mucoviszidosis, diabetes 1 (let's ignore the worsening of fragile x and chorea huntingtion across generations for a moment)? Should you be allowed to have children if you have trisomie 21, or some other mental disability? If you say no i think you are ableist and can't comprehend that people with special needs are still people that can be happy and can have desires. If you say yes why can't two cousins have a child? What if they have two forms of birth control and just want to fuck? What if they are the same sex? I my experience most people who are against two cousins having sex do not give a flying fuck about some theoretical chile but just think it's icky. Which is a fair feeling you are allowed to have but should not be basis for a law.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›