this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
610 points (88.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

45718 readers
1273 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This sounds like a stupid question, but I'm being genuine.

He is telling people to eat more meat, which sounds absolutely insane to me.

What qualifies him to give health advice ? Why are americans trusting him ?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

Again, we americans are not. Only the antivax fools are.

[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago

This all stems from eroded systems coupled with a lack of good education and our media. Not everyone is listening to him but his messages didn't become popular overnight. The carnivore diet, raw milk, anti vaccine, anti masking, anti fluoride movements have been bubbling in echo chambers for decades now.

Because people weren't smart enough to see through them, they've created a market for alternative health and pseudo science.

We're living that quote from Carl Sagan.

I have a foreboding of an America in my children’s or grandchildren’s time—when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the key manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what’s true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness.

[–] EsmereldaFritzmonster@lemmings.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are SEEMINGLY UNLIMITED reasons to discredit this person and one of them is not 'addict in recovery'.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Hell, for the right person that could've made them even more credible.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I've gone zero days since the 2024 election without seeing a liberal target fascists with insults that are oriented toward vulnerable groups. Jokes about old people being valueless, queer people being weak and deceptive, fatness as a sign of poor moral character. People who make these jokes also incomprehensibly claim that they challenge fascism fundamentally and not only when it comes for them.

This man is going to be singlehandedly responsible for an incalculable number of deaths (many of which will be addicts who are disproportionately excluded from access to medical treatmen) and he is in the position to do so by capitulating to an infamous pedophile, rapist, and failed business man. What kind of person would take the opportunity to assert that addicts aren't to be trusted when talking about a man who is already RFK Jr.?

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 4 points 18 hours ago

There are pictures of this guy eating dog roasted on a spit. I am certain he picked up that dead bear because he wanted to eat it (the one he dumped and made it look like it was hit by a scooter).

[–] drcabbage@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one is taking his advice.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

My last job was at a very large university, top 25 SEC state school. My boss supported Trump in part because she knew RFK was going to fix things.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

He’s not trusted by most Americans.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wtf is wrong with being a former heroin addict? I know plenty of drug users and former drug users who aren't fascist shitstains and are actually pleasant people. Also like, you're going after him for being a former addict? God forbid someone be in a bad place in life and luckily manage to recover from it... Addiction, a health condition, just morally scars you for life then? Would you say that about someone who recovered from cancer? Fuck off.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 day ago

yeah the question is not phrased properly

it should be "why are the people who give former drug addicts a bunch of shit when it's convenient to them now paying attention to a former addict"

It's about the hypocrisy, not the person's past

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 200 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Being a former heroin addict doesn't make someone a bad source of information, especially if they've turned their lives around.

But I agree otherwise

[–] eddanja@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Having a worm drive your thoughts does tho..

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 41 points 2 days ago

Yeah, "from a guy with a dead worm in his brain" would make for a better question.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 141 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fuck RFK but I will never hold being a former heroin addict against him.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Yea it's not the addiction or even the brainworms that disqualify him, it's simply his stupidity.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 84 points 2 days ago (15 children)

As much as I wish this dude would immediately suffer cardiac arrest from a clogged artery, him being a former addict has nothing to do with anything, and in itself doesn’t devalue anything he says. That kind of thinking is pretty problematic, and you need to have a real hard think about the way you obviously look down on people who are recovering from addiction, cause honestly you’re being pretty shitty right now.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mmmm, I think there's still a point to the question. Being an addict is not a moral failing; it doesn't make you less of a person. But the vast majority of people who believe in RFK also believe being an addict is reprehensible.

t's like how people ask Christians why they vote for someone who's been married x times. Personally idgaf how many times Trump has been married, I care about how many women and children he has assaulted. I don't think divorce is a moral failing; hell, I don't believe in the institution of marriage by the state. But, the very same people who hold him up also claim to believe that it should make him unworthy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] DCErik@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago

Americans are not, but Republicants are.

[–] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is honestly a disgusting take because it shows how biased you are against addicts. Not a stupid question. Just a nasty one. Your 2nd and 3rd are good questions though. I don't think there's jack shit qualifying him to give health advice in reality. He's a crackpot supplement pusher. Which I feel kinda answers your 3rd; americans have a long history of being stupid and blindly trusting whatever the pill-pusher says, because they hear what they want to hear. Unfortunately.

I hate RFK and all the damage he's done/is doing to our country's general state of health. His history of addiction is literally last on the list of reasons not to trust him. In my view, a history of addiction (now being in recovery) usually gives you a pretty sane view of health, since it brings you so close to death. The overwhelming majority of recovering addicts that I know lead healthier lifestyles than non-addicts. Oftentimes when people see with clarity how much damage they've done to themselves, they desperately want to treat their body better.

This was exactly my first thought. He should be disqualified for many reasons, but that ain't one of them. Thinking that way is why we have him.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 74 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fuck rfk, but him being a former heroin addict is probably his least worst trait.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago

I'm sure he was just as crazy before and during as he is after.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)

A third of the US are beyond help, beyond fucking stupid. Another third can't be arsed to do anything, they're so apathetic. One will follow without question, the other might go either way.

Also Shitler put RFK in place, so we're all forced to hear his moronic opinions...

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Some people in that first third aren't that stupid but they're gullible and insecure. Maybe also a little stupid. My girlfriend's dad, for example. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed, I think he's about average intelligence, but he's gullible and insecure. I think he got sucked in when he started listening to some questionable podcasts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Why are americans taking health advice from a man who got brain worms from eating roadkill and didnt learn his lesson?

Thats the more appropriate question.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've got nothing against people with former drug problems. I don't trust him because he's a doofus.

[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Did everyone forget he drove around with a dead animal, and dumped it into a park?

No one should listen to this insane lunatics ramblings. But the addiction is a symptom, not the problem. He likely became an addict because he was mentally ill. Or, the addiction (and brain worm, and eating random dead things) made him mentally ill.

Either way, someone with delusions shouldn't be in charge of anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Being a heroin addict does not make you a bad person anymore than having diabetes. Fuck off with that moralistic shit.

The guy is a scourge of humanity because of the choices he made and beliefs he holds. Don't make it look like heroin is the cause.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not taking his advice, not trusting him with anything.

This administration is nothing but a bunch of ignorant narcissistic racist scared buffoons who were taken from Fox News. The people who trust him are ignorant narcissistic racist scared buffoons who watch Fox News.

It's really amazing how inept they all are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hitstun@feddit.online 41 points 2 days ago

Every Cabinet position is filled with the worst possible person for the job. This is done on purpose to make the government fail at all the things it should be doing. We knew this would happen, of course.

Take everything they say as examples of what not to do. Don't do what Donny Don't does.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

This question really pushes the boundaries of the concept of "no stupid questions", but I will respect the premise and answer with all seriousness.

There is nothing about being a former anything that is automatically disqualifying.

Not everything he says is without merit. Even a blind, dumb squirrel can accidentally find a nut.

Americans aren't trusting him. He is only respected by the deluded cult members, and then only because their pedophile leader tells them to.

The people who don't realize he's full of shit are the people who can't handle being the most ignorant person in the room. They're swallowing all the bullshit that this administration spits out because it's the only way they can pretend they are better than everyone else.

It's all just corrupt, diseased minds taking advantage of other corrupt, diseased minds. If they didn't reject the compassion of their opponents, I'd have sympathy for them. However, they chose the darkness.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago

Americans don't trust him at all. His own large, famous family hates him with a passion, every single one of them. He was thrust upon us by professional trolls who think it's hilarious to watch people who actually care about their nation and it's citizens get upset.

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 5 points 1 day ago

The politically correct term is 'people of the land'

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Americans aren't. Fascist ignoramuses are. Those are not americans

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If he was a progressive pro-intellectual/science ex-heroin users in an alternate timeline, would that still be a disqualifier?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 10 points 1 day ago

Heartwarming how many comments are defending sufferers of addiction in here from being lumped in with this piece of shit. Fedi remains such a breath of fresh air.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They're not. Make no mistake, MAGA is full of a myriad of ideologies ranging from fascists, christian nationalists, white supremacists, anti vaxers, misogynists, transphobes/homophobes/terfs, pedophiles, capitalists/monopolists, incels, manosphere bros, and more.

They don't care about what they together stand for, because as a single entity? They only stand for one thing: the power to take away social and civil liberties. To fuck the public, and maximize profit and control, to MAKE us all, at home and abroad, comply.

Even amongst MAGA, RFK Jr is a joke, only a small subset of MAGA take him seriously and luckily they'll be dead of heart attacks and treatable diseases soon. What's sad is they'll have taken down so many innocents along with them. RFK Jr is there to distract the American public of the real issues with our Health Care System which is mainly affordability, access, and a competitive public option. It's not that he's even in the pocket of Big Pharma, though that is likely true. But even if he isn't, Big Pharma still benefits from his incompetency, from the sideshow he creates.

Hopefully that clears things up. Americans aren't stupid because they don't have access to the medical research and information, Americans are stupid because their pride tells them that their intuition and their echo chambers of validation make them right in spite of aforementioned research and information. That's MAGA, that's America.

Basically all of us are choosing the devils we know because we gave up on looking for angels of our better nature long ago.

load more comments (2 replies)

...do you not understand this position isn't even elected? I'm not fucking trusting him.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Even his own family members have said he is in no state of mind or health to be in any position of authority whatsoever.

[–] I_Clean_Here@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Him being a former heroin addict is completely besides the point. His opinions and arguments would still be bullshit if he were the most competent medical professional in the world.

Nice ad hominem fallacy. This is at its core like saying AOC is an incompetent politician because she was a bartender once. It does not matter for the validity of their opinions.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As others have pointed out, being a dry addict ISN'T a reason do dismiss what someone is saying, even about health.

Being the guy whose brain worm died from mercury poisoning, though..

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›