this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
179 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

80634 readers
3632 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Savaran@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, in the least consumer friendly fashion given this court.

[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I feel like they are targeting big tech here.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Supreme Court is taking up a case on whether Paramount violated the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) by disclosing a user’s viewing history to Facebook. The case, Michael Salazar v. Paramount Global, hinges on the law’s definition of the word “consumer.”

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Michael Salazar claims that his subscription to a 247Sports e-newsletter qualifies him as a “consumer.” But since he did not subscribe to “audio visual materials,” the district court held that he was not a “consumer” and dismissed the complaint.

[–] rmt_online@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Depending on how they rule, this could set us back about a couple of decades!!! :-(

[–] mrnobody@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

Could you explain? Why would that set us back? You mean if Paramount wins?

[–] dan@upvote.au 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Interesting case. If the plaintiff wins, I suspect this will mean that sites with videos won't be able to use third-party analytics scripts (not just Meta pixel, but also things like Google Analytics), which would be a pretty large change for the industry.

I'd love to see first-party tracking become more popular again. I self-host Plausible for my sites, but I've considered switching to Swetrix.

[–] CaptKoala@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

That's a lot of words to say "this area needs reform"

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

..... news laws for new mediums