this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
329 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

79476 readers
5895 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mohab@piefed.social 80 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You know, watching cartoons when I was young, I always thought it's unrealistic the bad guys keep trying the same insane plan to "take over the world" or whatever when the hero had foiled like 1,000 of those already… I always thought "no way villains are this stupid"

Fuck me, what did I know? Turns out they actually are.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 46 points 1 day ago

"I only have to win once." - Lex Luthor

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Actually I always thought it was insane that they DIDN'T try the same insane plan more than once.

Like, half the time Cobra's crazy plan ALMOST worked. But either luck or some fixable hole in the plan stopped it. But if they just tried it again but just learn from the failure, address the problems they hit, and try again. Maybe even a third time.

But no, they'd always just try some other totally insane plan instead. Every time.

In this case they're trying stuff that has, in some cases, worked.

I don't think they're shooting for Germany 1938. They're shooting closer to Putin's Russia. One of many "successful" totalitarian takeovers.

[–] robomuffin79@lemmy.world 84 points 1 day ago

It was never about who owned it or privacy concerns. It was always about censorship and controlling what young Americans could see

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 47 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So... USA-ownership looks even worse than a Chinese one? :)

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Eh, it's actually a wash. China did the exact same shit with different key words. They were just smarter about it.

And most of the censorship was in China.

Because China is a totalitarian dictatorship, and is no ones friend.

Just because the US is shit, doesn't make China any better. The world isn't black and white, it's mostly black and dark grey.

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So China-ownership was better because it censored China-related stuff in China and didn't care much about other themes in other countries. It is exactly what your colorful analogy means. The world isn't black and white indeed:)

[–] belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Sure, if you gloss over the "most" part and replace it with "all".

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except for the subtle Chinese propaganda constantly fed to the rest of the world. Now the propaganda is blatant enough for people to abandon the app, so the world is technically better for the US seizure. The app went to shit, but it was already pretty bad, so no net loss there.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

Now the propaganda is blatant enough for people to abandon the app, so the world is technically better for the US seizure

Right because homegrown propaganda tastes so much better than foreign.

Invade, Invade, Invade, Yum, Yum, Yum!

You know US only controls the tiktok infra in the US market, right?

Are you one of those "us is the center of the universe" guys?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe to left leaning Americans. To a European like me they look essentially identically bad and promote authoritarianism. I wouldn‘t use either version.

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Associated Press shouldn't take their 'glitch' claims at face value.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's not a ~~glitch~~ bug, it's a feature.

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Apparently some people are going over to UpScrolled. It is an Palestinian-made app similar to TikTok/ Instagram.

I have tried UpScrolled but it is still barebones but seems interesting (imo).

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

From what I've heard it's got a worse Nazi problem than Twitter

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I have joined ~~yesterday~~ two days ago and so far, no Nazi problem on my feed. However, it is mostly regarding politics.

I keep my feed focused on anime as far as that’s possible.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That name just sounds like a phishing domain...

Never really tried tiktok, notgoing to try this app either. I hope someone makes a frontend for it like redlib or nitter, so I selfhost and redirect links.

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

EDIT: Read wrong. You don’t have to try the app if you don’t want to. Up to you.

Don’t know about Redlib nor about Nitter.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Is that the one that uses peer to peer tech to share videos?