this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
637 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

79763 readers
3258 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 93 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (4 children)
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 4 points 7 hours ago

Want us to put your show back on? Yes? Then read the following aloud 5 times while slapping your face continuously: “I am sofa king, stupid”.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 78 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I want a dumb tv with the price and and specs of a smart tv. Less is more

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

What you’re looking for are commercial screens. They’re a bit more expensive for a comparable panel, as they are intended for 24/7 use- but are about as dumb as they get nowadays.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] avg@lemmy.zip 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You would likely have to pay more since they aren't getting to sell your information.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 11 points 14 hours ago

*you would have to pay more because major companies know they can charge more. There isn’t a limited amount of profit a company wants to mae, and then they pick a price from that, they price it as high as the market will bear.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I second this.

The TV industry can crash and burn otherwise.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Realistically, not only do I not want an 8k tv, but I might not get a tv at all, if I had to do it today. We rarely watch tv anymore. The brainrot is the same but we’re much more likely to use individual screens

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 14 hours ago

Silly goose, after 8K is 16K!

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 35 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Theres a ton of other things I want my TV to do before more pixels.

Actual functional software would be nice, better tracking on high speed shots (in particular sweeping landscapes or reticles in video games) higher frame rates and variable frame rate content, make the actual using of the tv, things like changing inputs or channels faster, oh man so much more.

Anything but more pixels.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I still probably watch 90% 1080p and 720p stuff lol. As long as the bitrate is good it still looks really good.

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Between a poor BluRay copy and a good DVD copy, the DVD always wins out.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago (13 children)

Actual functional software would be nice

you do not want software on your TV.

[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 11 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Yes I do. I want an actual smart TV with a practical, open source, TV-optimitzed Linux OS. It's not that software on a TV is a bad idea in itself. It's how it's ruined by for-profit companies.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Inucune@lemmy.world -4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well, when NFL broadcasts on 720 or 1080i, an 8k tv isn't going to make that look better. Even a prime subscription only gets you 4k.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Most developing countries have cheap 1080p TVs right now, but others are still using CRTs, and still others are watching on their phones (like some of my poorer relatives who do get their entertainment fix through their phones while the big TVs in their living rooms rarely gets turned on).

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think my TV is like 32" and 720p from 2012 or so. It's fine.

Before that I had a projector which was fun sometimes but mostly too big for the room. Cool to take psychedelics and run a visualizer while it was pointed along the floor at you. You could feel the fractals on your skin. I don't do that anymore, so a 32" TV is fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 40 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

They showed Skyfall on 70ft IMAX screens, and that film was shot 2880 x 1200. Its not all about the pixel count.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 200 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (29 children)

It's about time the electronics industry as a whole realises that innovation for the sake of innovation is rarely a good thing

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 138 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Look, we can’t have TVs that last 15 years anymore!

We need to keep people buying every year or two. Otherwise line not go up! Don’t you understand that this is about protecting The Economy?!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 95 points 1 day ago (25 children)

Gaming was supposed to be one of the best drivers for 8K adoption.

Whu? Where 4k still struggles with GPU power? And for next to no benefit?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

8k would be cool to display lots of windows at the same time but fairly useless for gaming.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 20 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Introducing the new DLSS 9, were we upscale 720p to 8k. Looks better than native, pinky swear.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 148 points 1 day ago (24 children)

There’s no 8k content, and only recently do standard connectors support 8k at high refresh rates. 

There’s barely any actual 4K content you can consume. 

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›