this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
644 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
79879 readers
3173 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Whu? Where 4k still struggles with GPU power? And for next to no benefit?
8k would be cool to display lots of windows at the same time but fairly useless for gaming.
Everything above 1440p isn't offering any display space. I have a 4K monitor but 150% DPI is needed to make things big enough to work with.
I'm using a 5k by 1200 monitor and it's awesome with Kde. I suppose it would be equally great with other interfaces.
Introducing the new DLSS 9, were we upscale 720p to 8k. Looks better than native, pinky swear.
What’s dumb is that 3D failed because of lack of resolution and brightness, and now we have more pixels than we can handle and screens so bright they can hurt to look at. PS3 had a couple games that showed different screens to two players wearing 3D glasses. I’d love to see full screen couch coop games with modern tech. 8K isn’t solving any problems.
3D failed for the exact same reason VR is failing now. Nobody wants to wear headsets at home.
Or anywhere, really. AR/XR glasses are a big improvement, but can still be clunky.
Or bring on the neural shunt. Not so fast, Elon. It's not for your purposes. It's for mine. And I can't see who I could trust with direct connections to my brain... But once I plugged in, I love Amazon, and you should subscribe!
But VR can do a lot of cool things, 3d... not so much.
Screen dimming is technically possible over HDMI/Displayport no idea why its not properly supported and integrated into monitors, graphics drivers, windows and Linux. KDE shows dimming for monitors sometimes? Don't know if that is software or real hardware dimming though.
It’s real hardware dimming.
Nice thought so but wasn't sure.
I’m talking about brightness in context of 3d. KDE uses DDE with USB connected monitors which is the same thing as using a button to lower brightness.
I dunno. Oxygen Not Included looks crisp on a 4K monitor. And it makes my job easier, being able to have an absolute tonne of code on-screen and readable. I reckon I could probably use an 8K monitor for those things.
Yeah, I generally have FSR running on any 3D game made in about the last decade - even if I can run it at 4K at a reasonable framerate, my computer fans start to sound like a hoover and the whole room starts warming up. But upscaling seems a better solution than having separate monitors for work and play.
Yeah, can't run it, Internet too slow to steam it
Pretty sure my GPU could run 4k Rimworld, just play good games instead of AAA games.
But we are talking TV. RPG with a controller is more suitable here. And there are some great RPG games.
FR. What distance and size do I need to be able to actually see the difference between 1080p and 4K? Cuz my current setup does not allow me to notice anything but the massive reduction in performance, unless it's a 2D game and then everything becomes too tiny to effectively play the game.
4k is noticeable in a standard pc.
I recently bought a 1440p screen (for productivity, not gaming) and I can fit so much more UI with the same visual fidelity compared to 1080p. Of course, the screen needs to be physically bigger in order for the text to be the same size.
So if 1080p->1440p is noticeable, 1080p->4k must be too.
Like I said, 2D things it is noticable only because it makes everything smaller (there is more space because the elements inside that space are smaller). However movies and 3D games? No difference.
Even going from 640x480 to 1024x768 makes a noticeable size difference with the 2D elements of a UI.
It’s about 60”. That’s the point where we noticed pixels at 1080P. HDR is more important.
I'm using a 60 inch tv as a monitor to my desktop - I sit in front of it at a distance of about 2m. It feels really nice to have stuff in 4k, so it's always 4k except the games that are too tough for my 2060 super to give me 60p.
It's very noticeable at the DPI of a 27" screen from arms' length. Or maybe not if you can't see very well. But on a TV from 10 feet away, I dunno if I could differentiate 1440p from 4K personally.
I have 27 inch 2k monitors at work, and it's already enough
27" 2K is a good DPI. I personally only went up to 4K 27" because I also wanted OLED, and the 2K OLED panel I was using had some noticeable text fringing because of the subpixel layout. At 4K it's not noticeable anymore.
For PC you can actually see the benefit between 4K and lower resolutions.
It's for TV where it's likely useless to have 8K
I am on a PC... You mean a smaller monitor closer to my face?
Yes, that's what I am saying, for a monitor you can easily see the difference between 4K and lower. While for a tv if I remember correctly for a 55' over 2 meters and something from the TV you can't tell the difference between 4k and 1080p