Did you read my comment through an LLM summary? Your response has no connection to my comment.
calcopiritus
Humans can be held accountable though. Which means they would rather say "I believe this is because ..." than "you are absolutely right! If you remove the voltage regulator from the power supply, it will provide more power!". And if they don't, they can be fired or put in prison, where they can stop doing harm.
If your LLM repeatedly lies to you, there's nothing you can do about it. Maybe try another LLM, but there's not many of them and they all lie.
If that were true, there would've been a software explosion, since LLMs have "killed manual programming" for some years now according to the guys that earn money when people believe that.
There hasn't been any perceivable increase of software products over these years. Nor a decrease in their price.
The only notable differences are:
- LLMs shoved into every software product.
- Microsoft software getting even worse since they claimed they were using so much LLM.
How do you even begin to make an anticheat for Linux? It just takes one person to make an Ubuntu (or any other popular distro) distro that gives fake answers to whatever API an anticheat program may use. You just download that distro and use cheats. It would be indistinguishable from the upstream distro.
You don't need to build gas chambers to be a fascist.
Unfortunately, it's the only sane cross-language ABI option there is.
C++ is a close second, which is mostly because C++ uses the C ABI wherever it can.
Even if the language itself is obsolete, it will live on for many more years just because of that.
Go to crates.io, search for whatever you need. Most probably it will be multiplatform.
There are plenty of cross-platform libraries in rust. In fact, most of them are. Since Rust is cross-platform at its core.
"plugins" is not a feature. What plugin specifically do you need? Most probably you can accomplish whatever you need with a library and iced. Plugin is just a fancy word for library.
Yeah. That's a huge issue rust has. However, it can't be solved with Rc.
You either do it in safe rust, by "cheating" the borrow checker and storing a size offset of the buffer instead of a reference. Or just use unsafe rust and store a raw pointer alongside the buffer.
This is not about that. This is about a security researcher that wasn't paid by Microsoft's bug bounty program when they found a security bug.
Bug bounty programs exist to prevent this exact scenario. To give people a reward for privately disclosing the vulnerability with the devs instead of publicly/to a bad actor.
Well, you can say stupid shit and only realize it after you already posted it.
In those situations it's better to just edit the comment so people can still read the stupid shit with the context that the commenter doesn't believe in the stupid shit anymore.