calcopiritus

joined 2 years ago
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

If the new games were any good, people would play new games. Enshittification + survivorship bias = people play old games.

There's good news though. Sony has PLENTY of old good games that aren't on steam. They could just release them. Making a PC port of a great game is much easier and cheaper than making a great game

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 4 points 24 minutes ago

Customers: we want Bloodborne on PC!

Sony: people don't want PC games. They want AI!

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You can also have shit leaders that micromanage. What even is your point?

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

There's 24h in a day for leaders too. A leader cannot achieve infinite output by being infinitely good, just like an expert cannot achieve infinite output by being infinitely good.

Expertise is also a force multiplier.

A single expert in a team of juniors can do so much more. Because it can delegate the junior work to the juniors while doing only expert work. Thus ending up with more expert work done.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

What? You are incredibly talented? Sorry, we assigned you to X instead of Y. Which means you no longer have a job. Goodbye.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. Revealing the name and version of the software that is interacting with the network is indeed bad.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Well, you can say stupid shit and only realize it after you already posted it.

In those situations it's better to just edit the comment so people can still read the stupid shit with the context that the commenter doesn't believe in the stupid shit anymore.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Did you read my comment through an LLM summary? Your response has no connection to my comment.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Humans can be held accountable though. Which means they would rather say "I believe this is because ..." than "you are absolutely right! If you remove the voltage regulator from the power supply, it will provide more power!". And if they don't, they can be fired or put in prison, where they can stop doing harm.

If your LLM repeatedly lies to you, there's nothing you can do about it. Maybe try another LLM, but there's not many of them and they all lie.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If that were true, there would've been a software explosion, since LLMs have "killed manual programming" for some years now according to the guys that earn money when people believe that.

There hasn't been any perceivable increase of software products over these years. Nor a decrease in their price.

The only notable differences are:

  1. LLMs shoved into every software product.
  2. Microsoft software getting even worse since they claimed they were using so much LLM.
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How do you even begin to make an anticheat for Linux? It just takes one person to make an Ubuntu (or any other popular distro) distro that gives fake answers to whatever API an anticheat program may use. You just download that distro and use cheats. It would be indistinguishable from the upstream distro.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You don't need to build gas chambers to be a fascist.

view more: next ›