this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69298 readers
3851 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know there are alternatives like proton mail, tutamail, mailbox.org, etc... But what would be the issue if I create an email using my personal domain, stored in my hosting.. maybe encryption? It seems that no-one even consider this option, but I am not sure why...

What would you suggest?

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Object@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Owning a domain for yourself and having a provider send/receive email on your behalf is a common choice, and it has its own benefits such as being able to migrate to other providers easily. As long as you renew your domain properly, it should be fine. Though do note that only you would use that domain, so anyone would know it was you who sent that email.

Owning a domain for yourself AND handling email sending/receiving can be challenging because there's a chance your email gets filtered as spam, and the receiver doesn't get what you sent. It's also possible that your server goes down, and the email sent to you doesn't arrive properly, though the email server usually try to send again a number of times before giving up.

If you are confident about setting a server, I can personally recommend Mailcow. As long as you set up SPF, DKIM, DMARC, it should pass most spam filter including Gmail. If you don't want to deal with the potential headache, getting a provider to send/receive emails for you is a good choice too.

[–] zipkid@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

there is a lot to hosting mail. Reading about it, like this book will educate you about all that’s involved.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

To give some context, the special edition of that book has a different title that hints at how very challenging it is to get it right when you host your own server.

Typically, it’s much better to own a domain and pair it with FastMail or other reputable email provider.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I do aliases through simplelogin and have my domain hosted on mxroute.

My domain is my real last name...so I have subdomains like @myfirst.lastname.com gets pointed to simplelogin for aliases, which then forwards to mxroute. @mywifesfirst.lastname.com goes to the same simplelogin and points to her Gmail for now.

Mxroute is cheap and they've got decent web apps but really more made for traditional IMAP clients. And they don't really do groupware...just email. But that's really the hardest part, from an admin perspective.

Adminning email is getting to be a sacred art. It's a lot of work and a constant arms race both against incoming spam, and the spam filters for whoever you are sending to. A whole ton of work for what is really an essential Internet service (when I can't get into my credit card account because enom is slacking on forwarding mail, it's a problem...and also why I switched to simplelogin).

For how cheap mxroute is, IMO, absolutely not worth the effort of self-hosting unless it's actually your day job and you get some sick sadistic pleasure out of doing it on your own time.

The mxroute admin/owner himself also seems like a pretty chill guy. He's been pretty forward and transparent on Reddit and lowendbox.

Edit to add: important stuff...make sure that you have an email address that you don't host, to access stuff you need to for the stuff that you do (i.e. DNS, mail hoster, MFA provider, directory service, etc). I use a free proton for that.

[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Rolling your own email is a pain. That said, I use a VPS and host my own server with domain name and site for $5/month. Setting it up was a pain, but once you get all the records right so you're not considered spam, it works really well. That said, I haven't done anything with webmail; I strictly use IMAP and SMTP.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

grab a personal domain, setup smtp through proton then have your local mail client archive via imap

email is the only service i would never self-host directly.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But why support the Nazi sympathizer?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

completely debatable if you dig into it, which i have.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

heres a good in-depth writeup of how a single tweet was blown up by people with an agenda, or a general failure to critically think about words:

https://medium.com/@ovenplayer/does-proton-really-support-trump-a-deeper-analysis-and-surprising-findings-aed4fee4305e

believe what you want to believe of course.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I can read his tweet. It makes absolutely no sense as his words are the literal opposite of what is really happening right in front of everyone's eyes. The only explanation is he is sucking up to the party that is dismantling our democracy for his own financial gain.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The other user already shared some article with lots of historical data, both words and actions, that should give a better picture. Anyway, since you decided to ignore all that, then there is also to say that the tweet was a speculation made months ago on a topic where nothing happened yet (or at least, I haven't read any news about antitrust in the last month). I don't think anything will happen, but anyway that makes it at most naive.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Why you keep posting me articles about the FTC, when the appointee in this discussion was for the department of justice, and has been confirmed a week ago (on 11th I think)?

https://www.theverge.com/news/626502/trump-doj-recommends-google-breakup-antitrust-search-chrome

This is more relevant as the topic was antitrust and breaking monopolies. This still happened before Slater was officially confirmed, and it's something that was not started now. But at least is relevant.