this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
96 points (99.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

4443 readers
275 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Good.

After all the disclosures and, in particular the birthday book. it's eminently clear that everyone involved with Epstein and Maxwell knew exactly what was going on.

[–] Lycist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[–] mikenurre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But she still took money from MAC, a cosmetics company on the Israel boycott list. Seems like her morals can be set aside when she's getting paid!

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

That's pretty bad, good mention. Chapell is still net positive in my book but it's sad she's taking Zionist money.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But she still took money from MAC, a cosmetics company on the Israel boycott list

That's bad.

Seems like her morals can be set aside when she's getting paid!

That doesn't follow, though. More than anyone else, it's her agency's job to make sure she gets paid. If there were no other criteria, she'd "set aside her morals" for them before any single sponsor.