100
Why ‘deleted’ doesn’t mean gone: How police recovered Nancy Guthrie’s doorbell footage
(www.theverge.com)
While this case shows recovery is technically possible, it also shows it’s rare, resource-intensive, and reserved for extraordinary circumstances.
How does this show "it's rare, resource-intensive, and reserved for extraordinary circumstances" when that's entirely based upon the word of the people doing it in secret?
“Google is notoriously uncooperative with law enforcement; they will comply with search warrants, but in the least helpful way possible and they will fight it,” he says.
Google sent personal and financial information of student journalist to ICE
“Google has received legal process from a Law Enforcement authority compelling the release of information related to your Google Account,” it read. The email advised Jon that the “legal process” was an administrative subpoena, issued by DHS. Soon, government agents would arrive at his home.
The subpoena wasn’t approved by any judge, and it didn’t require probable cause. Google gave Jon just seven days to challenge it in federal court — not nearly enough time for someone without a crack team of lawyers on retainer. Even more maddeningly, neither Google nor DHS had sent him a copy of the subpoena itself, leaving Jon and his attorney in the dark.
This article reeks of whitewashing for the government and tech industry.