this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
392 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

81208 readers
4326 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 2 hours ago

Their best developers.

The worst ones are still there checking the vibe coded garbage.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How many lines of code have they had to fix thanks to AI?

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

That's a problem for the future team, not the current bosses who will give themselves golden parachutes.

[–] suddenlyme@lemmy.zip 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 9 points 2 hours ago

LOL. Exactly. This reminds me of a slop code change my manager recently posted. It was a million lines, where really it just needed to be like 3 or 4 lines. I refuse to do a real review for slop PRs.

Later in standup he proudly proclaims, "You know, that PR was mostly Claude." ... ... ...

I know! It was bad! You should feel bad! The fact that he was proud of it showed he doesn't know what the hell he's doing. More lines of code means higher performance, right?? 😂

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Always the fucking suits.

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 11 points 10 hours ago

They ate lying without a question.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago

Hm. A new way to tell something is shit without actually using these words

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 32 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Spotify's functions have not changed a bit since 2016. It is literally the same application, what has changed are the tiny things they're doing for compatibility but that is not really worth mentioning. Intentionally leaving UX out.

Honestly what code is there to write for this glorified web browser? They're probably also outsourcing most of their data collection and recommendation algorithms.

Buy physical media, rip CDs, share shit and that's it

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 4 points 4 hours ago

Find a musician you like. Buy their music on Bandcamp. Download as FLAC.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You are wrong on many points IMO.
I've been using it for nearly a decade, it's changed a lot.
I don't know why you'd be leaving ux out.
What code is there to write? You must be trolling come on now.

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I’ve been using it for nearly a decade, it’s changed a lot.

Same. I just simply don't agree. If you consider tiny features not a soul needs like yearly reviews of one's listening habits and the roll out of podcasts as things worth mentioning, ok, they were not exactly doing anything radically new at that point anyway.

I don’t know why you’d be leaving ux out.

Because UX 90% adds nothing and chiefly serves to suggest innovation.

You must be trolling come on now.

I am. I want Spotify employees to read this and get steamingly mad. They are complicit in ruining music.

+edited for formatting

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Like a lot of these big, consolidated, years long projects, the real work is maintenance. The rest is just a bunch of people desperately trying to improve obscure KPIs by 1%.

Mark Fisher's idea of market stalinism comes to mind

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Is that supposed to be impressive? Spotify is among the dumbest, shittiest apps. It's literally just a music library player.

Spotify doesn't exist because it's some genius app. It exists because of legal control. They have no reason to make the app better. Indeed their shitty capitalist motives continue to enshittify the app.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 14 hours ago

Notifications don't even work for most of my saved podcasts.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

Good thing Anna's Archive exists and just keeps getting better.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Reads as: we here at Spotify are a bunch of naive and gullible halfwits who have diluted themselves into being proud of it.

thumbs up the suspenders, belly proudly hanging over the belt and gently rolling the feet from heel to toe

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Ah man, in my mind I was definitely thinking of some weird sci-fi experiment that has developers in giant test tubes with liquid…

[–] atfergs@lemmy.world 30 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

This sounds like such a fucking nightmare. I got into software because I like writing code. Their job is now the equivalent of a full time PR reviewer.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

I don't review that shit. Those PRs tend to be huge walls of text. If you didn't take any effort into preparing something for me, then I'm not making any effort into reviewing it for you.

Let the slop flow! 🔥🔥🔥🔥

When it breaks, I'm also not jumping in to fix it.

[–] BaroqueW@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

PR reviewer but the dev was drunk, sometimes is a genius, sometimes is eating sand, doesn't follow guidelines, likes to duplicate code, and forgets what was in the original task description after a while.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

And even if you babysit it and carefully tell it all the mistakes, it will learn nothing and suggest the same stupid mistakes next tim. I did actually know a human just like AI and he kept his job for years before quitting to grift another company because management refused to believe he sucked. So I'm not optimistic about AI screwing up discouraging business leaders.

[–] generic_computers@lemmy.zip 8 points 13 hours ago

So glad I dropped Spotify and moved to Deezer.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 36 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Do you know what we call someone that doesn't write a single line of code?

Anything other than a "developer".

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 12 points 14 hours ago

A manager. This tool is for what managers think software development is: managing the production of code. From that perspective this hype makes a lot of sense, just turn all your current developers into managers with AI and you now have grown the team by 10x. You can go back in time and find many jokes about how adding more developers doesn't speed up delivery but slows it down. I don't see how AI would suddenly make that less true, especially since the AI is not accountable for its results, you are.

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 7 points 17 hours ago

Lmao, exactly. If you're not writing the code you're not the developer, the AI is the developer. Youre just another asshole who gets paid to do nothing.

[–] banshee@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Why would anyone think this is a good thing? You're actively telling the world that your product is likely full of bugs and hard to maintain.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

Or even to true believers, they can just vibe code up just as good of an app.

It basically declares point blank that the technology does not matter, it's their marketing and music rights only that matter.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago (3 children)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 14 hours ago

This is spotify. It's just a music player. The overwhelming bulk of the code was probably written like 20 years ago by a 15 year old.

[–] Skymt@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago

It's quite possible they already fired their best developers

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Look at the feature list bragged about. It's really simple stuff. I can absolutely believe they vibe coded that stuff.

The "hardest" one was to feed listener history to an LLM and have it generate a playlist based on the titles. That's such an absurdly trivial thing to do.

It's not rocket science. It's a trivial streaming music player.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 6 points 13 hours ago
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

My first thought for the title is thinking it's because they fired their best/most expensive developer and kept the AI baby sitters.

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 71 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

That explains how Anna's Archives got in

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 36 points 22 hours ago

From The Software Quality and Productivity Crisis Executives Won’t Address (via on Lemmy)

Executives aren’t ignorant. They have the data. They commission the surveys. They attend the conferences where CTOs present their concerns. They know that:

  • 91% of CTOs cite technical debt as the biggest challenge
  • 75% of projects are expected to fail
  • 69% of developers lose significant time to inefficiencies
  • Only 39% of projects meet success criteria
  • The recommended 15–20% investment in technical debt management yields better long-term returns than crisis spending

Yet they choose:

  • Not to allocate recommended budgets for technical debt management
  • Not to make quality a strategic priority despite CTOs’ and developers’ concerns
  • Not to mention these challenges in public communications to shareholders
  • To celebrate AI productivity gains whilst developers report record inefficiency
  • To focus on the next hype cycle (AI) rather than address fundamental problems

This isn’t a failure of knowledge. It looks to me like a failure of courage and integrity. A failure of the very concept of leadership.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 13 points 18 hours ago

Never used it.

Started self-hosting Navidrome.

Never gonna use it.

[–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 29 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

How is that still a reason to brag about

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] coherent_domain@infosec.pub 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't worked in the industry before, but I have always assumed the "best developer" reviews code and architects the project, thus they write a minimal amount of code pre-AI anyway...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lanske@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Glad i moved away from Spotify a year ago. Happy to ve using Qobuz and bandcamp

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›