this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
1290 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

81208 readers
4156 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 11 points 1 hour ago

It means we're doing something right.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 13 points 3 hours ago

According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement.

Are we on a context of rapid technological advancement ? I would say we are in a context of dire technological stagnation.

«AI» is a mirage that is utterly failing at pretty much everything it is applied to, and in every other domain I would say tech progress is coming to a halt now that our new feudal lords have conquered so much of the market.

This push by the EU is, apart from digital sovereignty, a very necessary push to get some innovation going again. I hope more complementary measures will follow ; we really need hardware sovereignty as well.

[–] klay1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

bad for competition? If people want FOSS software, well go make a good product then!

[–] DevotedShitStain69@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

Fuck Google!

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

I did. Not advisable at work 😞

[–] pimpampoom@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 hours ago

Let’s create open source even harder

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I would be worried if the contrary happens...

[–] ReluctantlyZen@ani.social 2 points 3 hours ago

Lol, what competition? If anything this'll increase it, since suddenly, there's room for others.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 32 points 8 hours ago
[–] Concur6053@lemmy.today 22 points 8 hours ago

Probably the most resounding endorsement they could hope for

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago

Alarm Systems Bad For Business, Burglar Claims

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 hours ago

Wolf decries Red Riding Hood for looking too closely at Granny.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

In other news: fire is hot, water makes things wet, and things that taste good make us happy.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

YSK that this is a) ragebait farming you for ad revenue and b) disinformation.

In the FT article referenced, there is no mention of open source.

Neither on his LI, which has a free access link to the FT article: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/kent-walker-5963bb198_google-warns-eu-against-erecting-walls-activity-7428100995995398144-I9Ac

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I’m going to throw that accusation of disinformation right back at you. He’s careful not to use the words “open source” verbatim, but it’s very clear what he’s talking about.

Every detail of the article is a fair summary of what he said, and you’re trying to pettifog over a string match.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Is that clickfarm your moneymaker? jfc

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

If we’re playing “everyone who disagrees with me must be a shill”, how much is your agency billing Google to simp for them on social media?

/s

[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 45 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

It's worth saying again: Google can fuck itself.

And I generally like Google's products. But they make plenty of money off of my data to say: Fuck Google.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 33 points 15 hours ago

Not good for whose growth? Because it'll be perfectly fine for eu. The fact that google is upset about this, should be all the tell you need to know you're on the right path.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 33 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Tough shit, you supported the MAGA movement and Europe, thankfully, reacted accordingly. Simply put, the good folks in the EU lost faith in the USA.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

The good folks in the USA have lost faith in the USA. Alas, the bad folks remain in power. heh

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 69 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Funny considering how much of Google was built on open software.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

To me it feels like there’s two Googles. The one that was run by Page and Brin was awesome, pretty much everyone in the industry wanted to work there.

Then they put someone else in charge to maximise shareholder revenue, and it went to shit soon after.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 4 hours ago

Public companies will always become so. They were only good because they were in the growth phase, the internet is not in the growth phase any longer, a few corporations control the gates to any industry, internet or what have you, and are squeezing everyone else.

Our wages go down every year in value as real inflation is higher than the cpi, while investors increase their margins at our expense. And we are too dumb to know it, trusting them, even now.

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. Open source is fine when it suits them but not fine when it doesn't.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 6 points 15 hours ago

This is why GNU GPL is very importand.

Here the GNU GPL comes to the rescue. The programmer shows the boss that this proprietary software product would be copyright infringement, and the boss realizes that he has only two choices: release the new code as free software, or not at all. Almost always he lets the programmer do as he intended all along, and the code goes into the next release. ref

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

I criticise Emma Stone's plan not to sleep with me.

[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 50 points 17 hours ago

Car company complains that city is developing Metro system.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

If Europe cares about climate change they will force carriers to open source their firmware. Why should a phone be allowed to be non-updateable?

[–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 27 points 17 hours ago
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 91 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

MoRe OpTiOnS iS bAd FoR cOmPeTiTiOn

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

competition is bad for competition

checks out

translation: having more competitors harms our chance of winning against them

[–] Itwasntme223@discuss.online 16 points 16 hours ago

Google is secretly panicking cause they lost an entire nation bloc. That's gotta hurt the pocket book somewhere.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 19 hours ago

More desperate pleas by Google. I just saw an article by some Google shill that made a case against self hosting. Next they'll try to make it illegal.

[–] firepenny@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Who will think of the shareholders? /s

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 60 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I'm not sure why anyone in EU, bloc or therefore canada should even care what an American company opinion would be at this point. They said they were moving on. They did.

[–] EaterOfLentils@programming.dev 2 points 10 hours ago

Lol Google can eat my poo.

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 60 points 22 hours ago

The leopard of consequences is hungry for tech oligarch faces.

Eat, you majestic creature. And godspeed.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.”

goog chief legal just being an edgelord while undermining some small things like uhhh... goog being under beck and call of an orange baby.

he didn't really define what's "best technologies" are -- in the world.

we can say COBOL is still alive because it is the "best technology" at what it can do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 70 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Remember, whenever you see a patently weak argument like this from a trillion dollar corporation, they’re not saying it because they think anyone will believe it. They’re saying it to give the corrupt politicians in their pocket some way to pull a straight face when voting in the corporation’s favour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 35 points 21 hours ago

How DARE they try to ELIMINATE our Services after ALL the MONEY we Poured in Donald Trump's POCKETS!

[–] xeekei@lemmy.zip 67 points 1 day ago

Fuck you, Google.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 74 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Wrong.

creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement

Wrong.

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms

What does he not understand about digital sovereignty?

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users

No, for Google. Also, wrong.

that the market moves faster than legislation and warns, that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.”

If that's the price to avoid technofaschism... And, again, wrong.

Tl;dr: stop wanking, Walker.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, declawing hurts huh

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

google can get bent

load more comments
view more: next ›