ParadoxSeahorse

In fairness some buggers print their emails

Tribal, yet futuristic. PAPYRUS!

I KNOW WHAT YOU DID!!!

Apologies, but obligatory Original Post

Some browsers will not keep your history indefinitely (or even more than a month) any more

ADHD overhead to further organisation?

I have folders of folders of bookmarks, save all tabs as a new dated bookmark folder at intervals (some bookmarks are therefore duplicated as many times as they continue to exist), just in case I hit the dreaded close all button.

I do try to get rid of them as much as I can, but it’s like in my mind when I’m deleting them the question is “is this process still running?” and (due to ADHD?) I guess 300 tabs is the answer?

Some things are not reproducible as bookmarks, for example pages with post content will be reposted on reload (or thawing)… which while perhaps is not great web design (and you would hope they would have error catching for safety), is a benefit of tab vs bookmark? Also I would say thumbnails as a visual reference, and they have actually saved me if a website has disappeared and all urls now get redirected, I have caught the title from the cached thumbnail.

I have found “history”, even if you select “keep forever” is always being deleted, and bookmarks do not get surfaced on search, presumably due to inefficient search/index/storage, however, tabs are very reliably right there.

If I could have a system, it would be no number of tabs, and they silently slip off into cold storage and lose their metadata over time, perhaps just a list of titles at the very top/bottom/oldest.

This is insane, I understand that :-)

That button should be able to be turned off; is there a delete all button on your hard drive? No, that’s insane. Tabs are files. Tabs are life.

He should accessorise that jumper with a combadge

Not at all, if your weren’t trolling, I hope your found those points helpful in describing the benefits of visibility.

One of the things I missed out was government accountability, where police departments have historically labelled these as isolated incidents, because the big picture is pretty sickening.

I hesitated whether to engage because your use of the word “completely” labels you a troll. You also put “bringing awareness” in quotes instead of using the word visibility, presumably to belittle the concept.

Visibility helps collect and track data, drive policy, reveal patterns, support victims and survivors, improve early intervention and prevention, and, hopefully, eventually, shift cultural attitudes.

But you could get that from Google if you gaf.

No

These comments seem to be full of the same people who misunderstand that the word “racism” describes a massive cultural and societal issue that affects people in large, hidden ways throughout their life, rather than using bad words.

If they had a problem in Italy of men being murdered for not being obedient, it might be worth considering broadening the scope of this classification.

This does not even target the perpetrators as a class (even though we can probably guess a general demographic), just classifies the crime according to what has happened to the victim, and why. This is the same for all hate crimes that are prevalent enough to warrant it. Imo it is the culture and society that makes it a hate crime, not just the intent.

I think that penalty is a hate crime. But you’re correct.