this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
101 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

46426 readers
752 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Realistically you shouldn't depend on a single place for backups

Remember 3-2-1. Three places, two mediums and one offsite

[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm doing a 5-4-3-2-1 method. 5 backups. 4 on-site. 3 attached to one machine, 2 of those are on separate external usb drives synced at different intervals. 1 in the shed.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 18 hours ago

The shed as an of site backup is a good idea.

We live in the shed (it is really its own entire stone building) during our full house renovation, so I have already run electrical and cat6a to the shed and have an old router in AP mode there.

Hooking up one of those NAS boards or a 2nd hand old PC there would be a good backup option.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 2 points 17 hours ago

Does that also include Burial?

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sheesh. Better setup a secondary destination for my customers just in case.

[–] exu@feditown.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

3-2-1 rule also applies with external providers

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just a reminder that a cloud provider can oopsie delete your data

The customer was fucking lucky they had their data also in AWS. many companies don't do multi cloud backups.

[–] brownmustardminion@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Backblaze deleted my project drive for a multimillion dollar project I was archiving through their desktop sync. It's largely my fault for not noticing the drive had failed when considering their upfront policy about them deleting your backups after a month of inactivity. Luckily it didn't have too big of an impact because the most important files were backed up elsewhere. I do wish their desktop app had better warnings about imminent deletions though.

[–] milan@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i wonder what trustworthy european provider to use anyway (that has similarly good pricing)

[–] hempster@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Personally I use Hetzner Storage Box

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Same. It's pretty cheap, comes with unlimited free traffic and is just simple to use. Supports many ways to access it, including BorgBackup.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 1 points 17 hours ago

Can I (figuratively speaking) just change the destination in my backup scripts and start writing to Hetzner... or are they using a completely different setup?

[–] bigDottee@geekroom.tech 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Certainly has me concerned. I'll have to investigate a bit more into the financial solvency of the company to better understand whether they are at least covering bills and such... but honestly sounds like they aren't and haven't been.

Going to need to start looking for alternative S3 type storage.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, personally I'm optimistic, but I'd be in a boat of expecting access to be shut off one day, and ready to start uploading to a new provider at any moment

[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 20 hours ago

I'm only concerned insofar as I don't know of a good alternative, and really don't want to spend the time shifting everything to a new system. I have 3 VPSes and 4(? 5?) home computers backing up to B2. The major ones, I have also backing up to disk, so really the risk for me is in that gap period while I find and set up on a new backup service.

This will be beyond annoying, but for me not catastrophic. Mainly, I've liked B2 - the price, and how easy it's been to use. I understand the UI; it's pretty straightforward, and it's directly supported by a lot of software. It would be a real shame if it went under due to mismanagement.

Also: another example supporting my theory that one of the major flaws in Capitalism is public trading markets. This shit wasn't an issue before they went public.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Time to set up other backups