this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
795 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

81869 readers
5452 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ring’s controversial, AI-powered “Search Party” feature isn’t intended to always be limited only to dogs, the company’s founder, Jamie Siminoff, told Ring employees in an internal email obtained by 404 Media.

In October, Ring launched Search Party, an on-by-default feature that links together Ring cameras in a neighborhood and uses AI to search for specific lost dogs, essentially creating a networked, automated surveillance system. The feature got some attention at the time, but faced extreme backlash after Ring and Siminoff promoted Search Party during a Super Bowl ad. 404 Media obtained an email that Siminoff sent to all Ring employees in early October, soon after the feature’s launch, which said the feature was introduced “first for finding dogs,” but that it or features like it would be expanded to “zero out crime in neighborhoods.”

“This is by far the most innovation that we have launched in the history of Ring. And it is not only the quantity, but quality,” Siminoff wrote. “I believe that the foundation we created with Search Party, first for finding dogs, will end up becoming one of the most important pieces of tech and innovation to truly unlock the impact of our mission. You can now see a future where we are able to zero out crime in neighborhoods. So many things to do to get there but for the first time ever we have the chance to fully complete what we started.”

Archive: http://archive.today/xKxOd

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 45 points 6 days ago

I have to say, it's nice that they got called out on this immediately for a change.

[–] Weirstone@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago
[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 19 points 6 days ago

Ancient book of Arabic numerals reveals 2 comes after 1.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

Breaking news: Fire is hot.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

Ok guys, hear me out.

I need you to buy these cameras and put them on your face.

We will record your video for you and keep it safe for you and never give your data to anybody and we'll do all of this for free.

We'll also give you all of the software and setup all of the servers for you. Don't you worry your silly head about needing to learn anything about how to use technology, just give us your life-long dependence as we'll take care of everything. Also, AI.*

Also, you will help save puppies and children and you are on the side of puppies and children, right? This is a great deal! You can stop reading here, just click the button to agree... for the puppies.

*

spoilerYou also grant to us full, exclusive, worldwide, in perpetuity, until the sun falls the rights to use your likeness, words, thoughts, essence, and produces in any manner that we, in our sole discretion, see fit and you also agree to submit to binding arbitration for any disputes

In exchange, We will never give away your data. But we will ruthlessly exploit OUR licensed copy of your data to sell to anybody who can do a wire transfer.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 15 points 6 days ago

It's about dogs and crime. Sure.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

fuckin'… they were expanding into dogs to distract from what the system was really for

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I never even heard of it before the superb owl ad. I couldn't believe how dirty it was to tug at our heartstrings to make us pay them to spy on us.

What the fuck, America?

[–] Pricklesthemagicfish@reddthat.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wait till you learn about flock cameras and the raven sound detection

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Is that the one listening out for gunshots? I don't necessarily have a problem with that unless it's listening in on conversations or something. But that would be a pretty good mic.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 days ago

always assume the equipment of our open air prison panopticon is more capable than they admit, but also never let them stop you from speaking truth

No its only for listening for lost dog barks. /s

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Hell, they were saying it was for dogs so stupid people would get their heart strings pulled and blindly sign up.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

No shit Sherlock

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 days ago

Y’all just need to think about the shareholders.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago
[–] ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip 196 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No way! It seemed so authentic when they said they’d search for dogs.

Imagine how evil you have to be to use dogs to sell mass surveillance.

[–] marlowe221@lemmy.world 132 points 1 week ago

I’m shocked! Shocked, I tell you.

Ok… I’m not shocked at all.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 123 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Imagine spending millions on an ad to alert people to your evil scheme.

Proof that you don’t have to be smart to be rich and powerful.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It shows you how insular these people must be. That ad was the result of meeting after meeting, plan after plan. They had convinced themselves that the public would eat it up. We would be like "Holy shit that's amazing, let's give you ALL our data and video and privacy!". They actually thought we would go for it. lol.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 73 points 1 week ago (2 children)

To be fair, I'm actually pleasantly surprised that people didn't go for it.

It's not like majority of people seemed to give a shit about privacy not too long ago...

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

Same.

I was sure the emotional manipulation tactic would be extremely effective. Guess it was a little too blatant, even for the general public.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My 12 year old was sold on the idea. But she's 12 and may love dogs more than people.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

The proof for that is abundant.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 64 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No kidding? Next thing you will be telling us that chatcontrol and age checks on the internet will be used for more than just protecting kids from pedophiles and be extended to crushing dissent and opposition and democracy itself, and building social scores on us with all information including these cameras that will be used secretly against us in a way we cannot know or challenge to determine our jobs, background checks, police scrutiny, how courts and government treats you, how business treats you, the prices you are offered online and in digital price tag stores (coming soon,) and even what search results you are shown. All calculated by the antichrist's company, for said pedophile or pedophile adjacent politicians deciding which of us are undesirable, and given a way to slip names of people into the bad score list themselves, always a selling perk under the table to leaders.

It's always just a trojan horse to get in the walls. It will never end with finding pets, with stopping child abuse, what have you. They find the instance that no one can disagree with then accuse people of helping child abusers, maybe you are a child abuser yourself! It's not subtle. All done by people that are mostly on the epstein's redacted and unreleased pages for actually fucking children.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Dont forget claims they also ate children.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You know.. here's the thing..

Years ago, I'd be on Reddit and reading the usual rants and raves about the government, and how the public should be wary of it and we are heading into a security state.. and I always positied that the real threat actors WRT privacy and security were going to be companies like facebook and google and the businesses that made internet-connected devices.

Compared to them, as far as data colleciton and surveillance of people - the government was filled with rank amateurs.

I'd consistently get downvoted or pooh-poohed for being "naive."

God fucking dammit.. on this.. I am absolutely pissed off that I was calling this one - and have been - for over a decade.

FML, I hate this SOOOOOO much.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 week ago

edward snowden pretty much spilled the beans on government mass surveillance many years ago, but most people just said "meh...whatever"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The whole "find lost dogs" thing was likely the result of a single meeting with the agenda item "how do we sell this thing we are already doing as anything other than mass surveillance for state actors?" They probably ended it early.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (5 children)

And in other breaking news: the sky is blue, tree pretty, and fire hot.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why anyone would have non-locally hosted video surveillance in and around their home is beyond me.

You're basically begging corporations/governments to spy on you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Between Ring and Jeffrey Epstein, it's surprising how explicit criminals are about their criminal intentions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 5oap10116@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago
[–] homes@piefed.world 26 points 1 week ago

They lied?!

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago
[–] Somecall_metim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

[–] Red_October@piefed.world 16 points 1 week ago

Yeah, we all saw that coming and it's exactly why everyone's freaking out about it.

load more comments
view more: next ›