A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Putting US lives and fortune on the line to fight Netanyahu's war of aggression for him.
trumps 1st attempt at IRAN, THROUGH israel only delayed epstein files from the news temporarily. hes trying to make something stick on the news, so people stop talking about israel. remember veneuzuala and minnesota, the news largely stopped talking about it.
Really gobbling down on it for Israel zionazis
We need to stop these international terrorists from setting up bases wherever they like.
I expect a war in March.
Is this brics -boys luring usa into a trap? I saw news about this where someone estimated that war with Iran could "last several weeks" i think this would be more like russias 3-day special operation in Ukraine rather than Maduro's kidnapping
Why would a group of countries that includes Iran try to get the US to bomb Iran? Is it perhaps more likely that the country which bombed it 6 months ago, whose leader Trump met with last week, would like it bombed? The country that's a major weapons importer from the US?
I think both can be true at the same time. While Irans target as part of the China-Russia-Iran coalition obviosuly cant't be bombing of Iran I wouldn't be suprised if there are at least thoughts about letting the US bleed in a war of attrition, especially from the Chinese side. Ot honestly would be rational to make the best use of the situation.
Yes i know israel wants to get rid of iran. You think there can't be any other countries or reasons to benefit from a war in iran, just a single one?
Why? USA and Iran don't have any common borders, so the war is very easy to control: it will be running as long as the USA will be willing to bomb Iran. The quality of Iranian AA was demonstrated during the previous "war".
What can Iran possibly do to harm the USA?
Are you seriously asking, what downsides does a war have? The previous "war" wasnt "war" at least on usa's side. A war in iran would mess with supply chains, tie usa forces and equipment to iran (which most likely costs pretty much) and im fairly certain they would be able to do at least some harm in middle east and probably by some terrorist attacks in usa also. But maybe im wrong and almighty usa would just be able to do whatever they want ?
I don't expect this "war" to be "war" either. Yes, the USA can do mostly as they please and nobody would dare to say anything.
Usa strikes iran, iran strikes usa aircraft carriers, boats, military bases, whatever and actually kills some usa's soldiers unlike their "retaliation" last time. I dont think they can just pull back and go home after that and thats why i think this time it would be war. Im not talking about anyone else saying usa could or couldn't do something, what i meant was you think usa can just do anything and be successful? As in i think attacking Iran isn't as simple as going to Venezuela
iran strikes usa aircraft carriers, boats, military bases, whatever and actually kills some usa’s soldiers
And? Ok, USA loses 2 patrol ships and 30 soldiers. What next? It is war? Look at Ukrainian numbers to see what the war is.
USA starts bombing Iran from distance. What is "isn’t as simple as going to Venezuela" here?
I don't see anything serious that Iran can do in this situation.
Yes i can see that
Ok, we'll see who sees better in a few weeks.
Is this some kind of a competition to you? :D
I have my reasons to hate Iran and I would be sincerely happy to see it burn.
Light the region's oil fields on fire and mine the straight of hormuz.
Iraq already did that in Kuwait and it accomplished nothing.
They even heavily armed the shore thinking the US would try a beach landing, and instead they were spammed with a barrage of missiles that stayed out of range of most of their batteries.
Iran would struggle to minefield the strait with the US navy just sitting on 24/7 standby.
Israel wants Iran's current government to fall, the US just isn't interested in doing a hard land campaign to accomplish it (yet).
They want it quick and easy like what Trump just did in Venezuela, but that's just not possible with Iran, which is why they're still open to negotiations despite Netanyahu showing up to the Whitehouse like its his own home.
The crux for the US is that trying to topple the regime via a military operation could easily backfire without a complete invasion. They're trying to find a pressure point that will cause the government to fracture internally, but they probably don't have any solid leads that could succeed, otherwise they would have done it during the protests.
Their own oil fields? I doubt that'll harm the USA. Especially now when they own Venezuela.
Closing Hormuz will be an inconvenience to a large variety of countries and I am not sure if that is what is good for Iran.
Iranian abilities are very limited and none of them are actually military. The world will easily ignore a temporary oil price spike as those spikes happen every time some shit starts in that region.