this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
1811 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

82000 readers
4318 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] StopTech@lemmy.today 2 points 18 minutes ago

The "Cancel ChatGPT movement" doesn't appear to be mentioned in the article, but other outlets say hashtags like #CancelChatGPT are trending on X.

[–] tostane@thelemmy.club 1 points 13 minutes ago

Amazon, gemini, perplexity are also in the us goverment baby bottle nipples.

[–] JigglypuffSeenFromAbove@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

From OpenAI's statement:

We have three main red lines that guide our work with the DoW, which are generally shared by several other frontier labs:

• No use of OpenAI technology for mass domestic surveillance.

• No use of OpenAI technology to direct autonomous weapons systems.

• No use of OpenAI technology for high-stakes automated decisions (e.g. systems such as “social credit”).

It specifically states their AI can't/won't be used for surveillance and autonomous weapons. Of course I'm not saying I trust them, but isn't this the same thing Anthropic says they're against? What's the difference here or what did I miss?

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 52 minutes ago

Anthropic put clauses in that were legally enforceable by future administrations. OpenAI says “yea we totally trust you bro”

[–] lumettaria@sopuli.xyz 2 points 40 minutes ago

Now imagine my shock when I had done the swap from ChatGPT to Claude the day before the news about Anthropic's (now backpedalled) deal. Anyway, I deleted ChatGPT and Gemini accounts and degoogled my life while I was at it.

[–] digital_digger@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Just the little push I needed to close my ChatGPT account

[–] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Same! Was planning on doing this today.

What do you plan to switch to? I’m currently thinking a combination of Claude and something else for images if it turns out I really need to pay for it.

[–] bobbbu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I use ppq.ai , which lets yo chose which llm/service you need, and then you are charged per query. It has all the latest models for imaging, text, video. Etc. So you get to use the one that fits the task best, and no need to pay for a membership. Which is way cheaper if you don't have professional use of heavy models, imo. It allows allows privacy payments (monero and such. I dont have that, just mentioning it is possible :)).

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 hours ago

Dude the only guardrails are

  1. No fully automated killings

  2. No mass surveillance

You could literally do anything else, you could automate killing people with a person approving.

Trump booted anthropic because they couldn't lift these two guardrails. Fuck me

[–] pnelego@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I’m wondering if this is a play for a future bailout. OpenAI knows they are fucked; and instead of just going away like most companies do when they fail, they are embedding themselves in the government to secure a bailout under the guise of a critical defence vendor.

Furthermore, I’m not convinced the researchers and critical personnel will work for a company that does this. I think we’re about to see the biggest jumping of a ship so far in the industry.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

That makes a lot of sense

[–] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The lesser of two evils is still...evil. Anthropic's hands aren't clean either...they're just minimally less caked in blood.

BUT

One can hope that this is the 'turn towards the light side'. If 'don't be evil' can finally be made profitable, well, self interest might actually be a lever for good. Ha.

I wish there was a clearly, unambiguously good guy in the cloud AI space. I don't know how to make that work with economies of scale being what they are. Yes, that includes Lumo - though one has faint hope on that end to.

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 45 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

You should also stop using Google products for similar reasons.

[–] qualia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Mass surveillance for advertising seems marginally more benign than mass surveillance by one's own government, personally. Though admittedly both are bad.

Edit: I can find alternatives for most of Google's ecosystem but mapping out accurate bus routes is terrible via OSM/OsmAnd or Organic Maps. Anyone have any tips there?

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 49 minutes ago

The mission statement is irrelevant when the outcome is the same. Google has data a hostile power wants and goes it to them whenever they want.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I just got grapheneOS on my new phone (it is a google pixel 10, but it is the one that can handle that...) I needed a client to use my gmail which will probably be the last thing I get rid of.

Are they shipping Graphene for the 10 now?

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

If it’s the sending and receiving part of email, I’ve switched to purelymail (you could pick another) and put it behind my custom domain name. Because behind a custom domain, that’s the last time you’ll have to update your contacts as it won’t be dependent on which email provider you choose.

Searching through decades of old emails I do still use the Gmail account, but I just have to get off my butt to self host a local IMAP server for that.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Did they make contracts with them?

[–] blankwire@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Wait I’m confused. Sam Altman is OpenAI right? And he says the DoW agreed to work with them but with the same prohibitions that Anthropic wanted?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›