this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
542 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

82131 readers
4146 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 35 points 9 hours ago (13 children)

OK Newsom, you've lost me. I enjoyed your chaotic responses to the drumpf but you've officially lost me.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Auth@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

Its parents that are pushing for this stupid shit. I hate that the majority of voters want to implement robust age verification.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Parents who view their kids as property

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

it's horrible

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 48 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Despite signing it, Newsom issued a statement urging the legislature to amend the law before its effective date, citing concerns from streaming services and game developers about "complexities such as multi-user accounts shared by a family member and user profiles utilized across multiple devices."

then why did you fucking sign it in the first place??

words cannot describe the depths of my seething hatred for the complete, museum grade, massive piece of shit that is Gavin Newsom

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Because it's a metric, a bullet point, and campaign speech fodder. Newsome thinks of his position in terms of a career rather than an office, his job isn't to lead a nation towards what's right or wrong, it's to pander so that he can be re-elected or elected to higher office.

The bullshit way that lobbying groups conduct polling and market research means they he's chronically out of touch and that his focus is on perpetuating his time in office so he can continue to "represent the people", making a calling out of bowing to the desires of the mis-informed, outraged, panicked mob he believes his electorate to be instead of actually having a spine and exercising good judgement.

The consequences of shoddy legislation take second place to being able to declare he did something to "keep kids safe". It doesn't even have to work, all that matters is having something to wave around and back up that claim. Something to placate the plebeians and let him continue to do what he does best... listen to lobbyists who are lying about what people think.

Why? Because that's what gets people elected these days. Despite being on a foundation of pure bullshit, somehow it works. So he goes along with it, encourages it, and remains in office as a result.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Will they patch useradd or adduser to support that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kablez@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

"Age verification" is a big umbrella. Claiming that merely checking an entered birth date is the equivalent of uploading an ID is disingenuous and just fishing for clicks.

Yes, there are tangible connections to other concerning privacy violations in this space... but come on. Steam asks you for your birth date before you watch an R18+ game trailer. I've been lying on that form for over twenty years, since before I was 18.

Getting upset over this feels like the beginning of getting your panties twisted over everything. "Oh no, someone pressed a button on a keyboard, that's how nukes are fired!"

This feels like a non issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qualia@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 58 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Why not parents responsible for their own goddamn kids? Stop interfering with the rest of our privacy for this bullshit. Parental controls have existed for decades. Fucking use them.

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 44 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because this isn't about parenting or children, it's about a creeping surveillance state

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The new California republic seems to be the only people who see this coming

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Patrolling the Mojave almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago

When I got deployed to Vegas I thought there would be more gambling involved.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 hours ago

What the fuck? This is ridiculous and it won't actually solve anything at all.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

root giggles

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 37 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

User age required to be entered. There is no verification.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Calm down! It's just my foot in the door!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Considering the massive number of servers running Linux used in the industry, this sounds like a good way to kill the Tech Industry in California.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 45 points 16 hours ago (19 children)

This is a gift to Microsoft.

This law only applies to computers used by children. The law explicitly defines "users" as minors. It does not apply to machines used solely/primarily by adults. It does not apply to servers, or other machines with no local users. It won't affect the tech industry directly.

This law effectively prohibits your children from (legally) using anything but Microsoft/Google products until they are 18.

With this law, Linux cannot be installed on a school computer. With a FOSS OS, the local systems administrator would be considered the OS provider, and would be liable under this idiot law.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

With a FOSS OS, the local systems administrator would be considered the OS provider

Would they though? I only skimmed the bill text, but I think it might be hard to determine who is the "OS provider", who is the "store" and who the "developers" are in the case of FOSS.

It doesn't require a numerical age but rather an "age bracket" that the user provides during setup (<13, 13-16, 16-18, 18+) which must be "made available" to the "store" and the store must have a mechanism for picking up that "age signal" (lol).

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, (and ianal) but the language seems incredibly loose. I would not be surprised if this thing gets poked full of holes and worked around (if it doesn't end up being tied up in court first.)

It would be hilarious if distros could just provide age bracketed ISO downloads for the under 18 brackets and say that the download of an ISO is part of the setup.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 22 points 15 hours ago

Why lawmakers are so stupid at understanding technology

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 42 points 18 hours ago (12 children)

Did you guys know I was born January 1st 1901?

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›