this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
399 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

82518 readers
5273 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

MidnightBSD, a FreeBSD-based desktop operating system, has quietly updated its README to reflect a new geographic restriction. The project has added a clause that bars residents of any country, state, or territory with OS-level age verification mandates from using MidnightBSD

(page 2) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

This is a feature and not a bug. The biggest distro maintainers will try to comply and the smallest ones will start banning usage or even closing up shop.

[–] TheLastOfHisName@piefed.social 8 points 21 hours ago

Why do I get the feeling I will be distro hopping in the not-too-distant future?

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Im just glad BSD is getting press.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

haha I guess that's one way to deal with it and do nothing at all. Doubtful they block the connections from those areas

[–] towerful@programming.dev 18 points 1 day ago

IDK. It puts them at the forefront of this fight.

If governments successfully prosecute distro maintainers (if they can) for this, then distro maintainers are liable.
And distro maintainers would then have to pursue non-compliant users to cover that liability, or fold.
Which is a huge loss for open source.

Or, there would be a huge legal fight and it turns out that the licence of a distro protects it from its users actions.
Which would be awesome and a massive win. It also makes sense. Nobody is suing an OS maintainer because it was used for a data breach.
And then the governments have to pursue the actual users. Which... is gonna be useless wrt these laws

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

how its done

[–] pfr@piefed.social -5 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Personally, I don't think this is the answer. Like, I get it, and it's a sure way to avoid having to deal with all this bs. But at the end of the day, the only people who suffer from this decision are the end users. It's punishing them for something their government has implemented. Doesn't seem right to me.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] nathan@piefed.alphapuggle.dev -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Ironic for "the bsd for everyone"

Edit: not trying to imply this is their fault. Just thought it was funny that something labeled as "the bsd for everyone" had to be limited to "not for everyone". I agree with their move to restrict downloads in these locations because of these laws

[–] inari@piefed.zip 10 points 23 hours ago

*Terms and conditions may apply

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›