this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
10 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4891 readers
482 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The government's key superannuation reforms are set to soon become law after passing the Senate on Tuesday night, which will see major amendments for low income earners, and those with super balances above $3 million.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So those earning less than $45k will get taxed less on their super that they can access when they turn 65. In terms of tax reform to help people in need, this does exactly fuck all.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

access when they turn 65.

60

aged pension when they are 67

In terms of tax reform to help people in need, this does exactly fuck all.

because that's not what this is, it's designed to make the super system a little more equitable, so when they do get to superannuation age they have a little more and to collect a little extra tax to spend on whatever; like NDIS or ANKUS

The Greens are still pushing for a more equitable tax system but I doubt we'll get little more than change at the edges as they don't have the numbers to push for reform, because voters don't really want change, its difficult to overcome voter greed, selfishness and apathy.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

60, my mistake. Makes zero difference in reality.

How does it make the super system more “equitable”?