this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

6385 readers
153 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chocolate Factory describes concession as an attempt to balance openess with safety

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aether_Well@lemmy.zip 10 points 49 minutes ago

Google: Pull your pants down. Bend over and grab your ankles. Hold that position because this is going to take a while.

[–] who@feddit.org 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The process is designed to create friction. Users must first enable developer mode in system settings. They then need to confirm that they're not being coerced. After that, they need to restart their phone and reauthenticate. And then they need to wait one day.

I hope this little interview is entirely on-device. It would be terrible if installing apps of our choice on our hardware required any contact with Google (even in the background).

[–] lemmysmash@beehaw.org 1 points 12 minutes ago

On device? While google services are present there? In this universe?

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 18 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

so-far

EDIT:

The process is designed to create friction. Users must first enable developer mode in system settings. They then need to confirm that they're not being coerced. After that, they need to restart their phone and reauthenticate. And then they need to wait one day.

Fuck all the way off, google

[–] IDew@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You can probably bypass the 1 day wait time by changing your system time but they really want you not do it

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 37 minutes ago

That's really unlikely

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

"Scammers rely on manufactured urgency, so this breaks their spell and gives you time to think." - Are these scams actually a real thing? I've never heard of such a thing happening, but I'm not well connected to things like people and their experiences.

it strikes me as another manufactured concern, to justify their malignent ambitions

[–] jello@programming.dev 6 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

It definitely is a thing, especially for the elderly. I'm not sure what percentage of scams are done that way, but it's much easier to scam someone if they don't have a chance to think much about what's happening.

That being said, most of the scams I know of that do this don't ask you to install an app on your phone. They just ask personal questions or for login details or something like that

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 2 points 5 minutes ago

most of the scams I know of that do this don’t ask you to install an app on your phone

ok, so what has blocking 'unverified' developers got to do with protecting people from scams, then? To be clear, I'm not asking if scams exist, I'm asking if scams that ask people to install dodgy apps exist. I'm extremely sceptical about this part!

[–] gnuthing@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 15 minutes ago

On PC they'll have the user install TeamViewer. I'm assuming there's some scammers that might do this for phone

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 38 minutes ago* (last edited 38 minutes ago)

The process is designed to create friction. Users must first enable developer mode in system settings. They then need to confirm that they're not being coerced. After that, they need to restart their phone and reauthenticate. And then they need to wait one day.

Waiting one day is totally unreasonable. However, I don't mind turning it on in developer settings.

[–] org@lemmy.org 2 points 43 minutes ago

Android is a joke.

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago

Balance *user acceptance with *control

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.org 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Chocolate Factory describes concession as an attempt to balance openess with safety

I describe the concession as an attempt to balance ending user agency with public backlash

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

I have a sideloaded program that hooks in as an accessibility app. Several times a week android asks me to review the programs access. Its maddening how far they go to shit on user choice.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I think I would call this a win. Can't imagine life without reVanced.