A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
“Public space in Paris is chaos,” right-winger Rachida Dati said recently
No right winger is worth listening to. I know nothing about Dati, but I am confident they are full of bad ideas.
Dati’s proposals for the city include making it cheaper to park and getting rid of the low-emission zone in the city centre.
As foretold.
Every right wing idea is bad, and people proposing them should at best be laughed out of the room.
She is the average right wing idiot and scares people with insecurity and shifts to far-right ideas real fast. 😬
Not every left-wing idea is great and not every right-wing idea is bad. It really depends.
For instance, american red states have really dumb gun laws but they make it very easy to build housing.
Building housing isn't a right wing idea.
They definitely mastered building houses on private islands
Building housing isn’t a right wing idea.
In the United States, it is.
California or New York barely build any housing.
States like Texas or Florida build a shit-ton of housing.
https://besi.berkeley.edu/publication/what-drives-high-costs-in-blue-states/
Sad but true.
Democrats aren't especially left, so I'm not sure you can really look at states controlled by the democratic party as a fair comparison. The US doesn't have much of a left. Many democrats are conservative, especially when its things close to home (eg: nimbyism, "i like black people i just don't want to live next to one", etc).
We have outliers like Mayor Mamdani who want to build more housing, but he's notably a DSA member. He does have policies for housing which are more effective than "fewer regulations and the market will solve it".
As such, if the argument is "Conservative controlled areas have fewer regulations, and thus more housing gets built", that's a very tenuous argument. The right wing ideology at play isn't "We should build more housing" but rather the usual "No one tells me what to do" attitude endemic to right wing thinking.
Furthermore, conservative areas tend to be sparser, which makes for more room to build, with fewer restrictions New York City is already dense. Adding more stuff is going to be more difficult and complicated than adding another building to Tumbleweeds, AR.
Lastly, if you did somehow prove that "conservative solutions to the housing crisis are good, actually, and aren't just deregulation and capitalist market solutions", I guess I would have to update my statement to "Almost all right wing ideas are bad". But as I'm not convinced this is the exception, I stand by my original claim.
What kinds of housing are Texas and Florida building?
This article is a pack of lies.... As always with Hidalgo....