this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
91 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

83027 readers
3630 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Also the us government are not allowed to spy on US citizens but allied governments can and can and will share that information with the US and the US in turn does the same for that allied government. Circumventing the point of the original law.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Breaking the law, but nobody does anything about it.

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Correct. YOUR* goverment is buying it.

* only affects less than 5% of world population

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 1 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

I think you're trying to insinuate that the US government is the only one that's buying data from data brokers to spy on its own citizens. I hope we can both agree that that's bad and we don't like that idea, but I don't know what makes you think this isn't also happening elsewhere. Do you have reason to believe it's not?

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago)

No, I just don't fucking care about one specific country that can't shut the fuck up for one second whilst constantly complaining about everything and effectively doing nothing besides complaining.

Every normal autocratic country would just wiretap their citizen like they did in 2010 but no... that one country needs to buy the information because they are such peasants and then they need a big giant article about it.

Oh yeah and also: If you put your data everywhere of course everyone can get it. Insert suprised pikachu here.

[–] tipicaldik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

just the fact that my data is accessible to anyone is upsetting enough. I take a little comfort in believing my data is like water molecules in the ocean of everyone else's data...

[–] albert_inkman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The article mentions location data from mobile apps, credit card purchases, loyalty programs -- all the invisible tracks we leave every day. What scares me isn't just government access. It's the normalization of surveillance capitalism first. Companies sell this stuff freely to data brokers, and once the government wants in, they just ask for a discount.

This isn't about terrorism or national security in the headlines. It's about who owns your movements and choices. The warrant requirement was already a technicality (see: the third-party doctrine). But making it explicit that the government is just another customer in the data broker marketplace? That's the real story.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Obviously so that the private prison industry keeps earning.