this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
97 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

83069 readers
3277 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@piefed.social 32 points 3 hours ago

Pop the bubble

Pop the bubble

Pop the bubble

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
[–] unnamed1@feddit.org 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think ai as technology needs saving, but the companies of the bursting bubble do. I love to see Altman struggle

[–] XLE@piefed.social 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

It's hard to tell when he's genuinely miserable because his face always looks like that.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

For the simple reason that is is REALLY cheap to make and monetize real porn.

The only people using AI to make porn are people who wouldn't be able to pay for it if they charged what it costs to use.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

It's really cheap to use a WAN model (or whatever the latest thing is) on my laptop to make porn without needing to find and hire a model, or even subscribe to an onlyfans. Also not paying OpenAI or anyone else besides the electric bill.

I don't think that's going away, and I would be a bit surprised if it's not already cutting into demand for the real thing (which I also think isn't going away)

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 1 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

Right, you can afford to do that because the company you are using is taking a loss on the product.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago)

What company? I mean local models.

Edit: Oh, WAN is the name of a model that makes videos, it's not Wide Area Network.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 40 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Which is an interesting take, because anything sex-related seems to be the only way to make money with AI.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 14 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

I hope the real reason is that they're running out of money to try new features. But some of their stated reasons, like their AI age verification sucks, aren't so bad either.

...Actually, OpenAI has a suspicious number of reasons why they can't do adult mode. I think they protest too much.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

I think it's about video generation. They shut down Sora because it was burning too much money. Imagine how much a massive amount of porn videos would cost.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

This here. The dirty not-at-all-a-secret is that NONE of it is profitable. It is all a money-burning, water-wasting, RAM-market-sucking black hole.

There is no road to profitability unless they somehow convince everyone to pay multiple thousands of dollars per year for subscriptions. At least that's what I keep hearing; evidence otherwise with real references, I'm open to consider.

EDIT: ~~back~~black

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago

Yep. I bet the reason they never actually closed the deal with Disney is that Disney discovered that shitty Sora CG cost more than their in house systems.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

That was probably what sunk the Disney deal.

Disney can already make shitty CG animation for basically nothing. What Sora did was offer a way of doing it without any real expertise, but Disney already had that. It was probably impossible for Sora to actually produce lower-tier Disney content for less than Disney is already able to do it for.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 3 hours ago

I think even the text prompts are unprofitable. Sam Altman said so once, even for paid plans. I wonder if they're still in danger of bleeding themselves dry. One can dream.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 0 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, i think they are already doing it as a pass-through with some other company.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 0 points 2 hours ago

They are probably licensing some bullshit to someone else.

[–] rogsson@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Why is that shitty product being used

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Suck it, Trebeck!

[–] lmr0x61@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

Damn, they don’t even think the goonbot will sell? They really must be in a tough spot lmao

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 2 hours ago

Yet another area where the big companies are voluntarily leaving money on the table for the open model users to rake in. I approve.