this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
294 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

83220 readers
3032 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wish they handled it better, but I knew about this a while ago, and the price is more than reasonable.

A decade without a price hike is extremely generous, especially at how cheap their plan was.

They are a FOSS company that makes a fantastic product I've been happy with for years, I'll gladly pay less than $2 a month to support them. Their server code is licensed with the AGPL, the strongest copyleft license there is, which gives me a lot of confidence.

Worse case scenario, they enshitify down the road, we are protected via the open source implementations. We've seen this many times in the past, Red Hat > Alma & Rocky Linux, Citrix Xen Server > XCP-ng, Terraform > Open Tofu.

Pay for your open source software, folks πŸ’–

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Paying for good software should be normalized again. One way or the other you'll always pay. If you don't pay with your money, you pay with your data.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 137 points 3 days ago (1 children)

20$/year is still cheap compared to other password managers, but yeah, the lack of transparency is worrying.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 26 points 3 days ago (31 children)
[–] Sunspear@piefed.social 71 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Thing is, a large percentage of internet-connected users might have two or more devices. The simplicity offered by a cloud (be it hosted or selfhosted) password manager is a huge benefit.

And unless you're already running a syncthing-like service for something else, setting it up just for a password manager when other services provide it out of the box, is not worth the hassle usually.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 26 points 3 days ago (4 children)

IMO Keepass and Bitwarden aren't exactly the same, as the latter has cross-device sync built-in.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 26 points 3 days ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] webkitten@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bitwarden’s Premium version now costs $20 per year,

This is what you're up in arms about? $1.50 a month?

[–] 0485919158191@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It's not about the price itself. It's about the lack of transparency. Not being open with a 100% increase is not a good look.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 67 points 3 days ago (1 children)

TIL theres a paid version of Bitwarden.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

They put a couple things behind the paywall of US$19.80/y: the ability to securely share files instead of just text, and to host TOTP authentication. As it is I prefer using other services for sharing, and while TOTP auth is nice I'm happy with Aegis.

Edited to fix Bitwarden's price obscurity

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shiftymccool@piefed.ca 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Get yourself a mini pc or old laptop and control your own future: https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden

[–] guy@piefed.social 45 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Would love to selfhost. However, I have no trust in my skills to secure my device in the same manner as a provider, and I do not wish my database to be compromised.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Then use Keepass, which is literally just a local app.

[–] guy@piefed.social 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I have used KeePass, but Bitwarden is far more convenient when you have different devices

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Lawl I pay for the yearly thing and I’ve never used any paid features, I just wanted to support them. I’m okay with the price increase, but it definitely would have been nice to have an announcement maybe in December or spending the they’re planning that. I wonder if I’m grandfathered into the same price I’ve been paying? Ehhh too lazy to find out. I’ll pay 20, but yah some transparency or forewarning would have been nice for a lot of peeps.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] alakey@piefed.social 42 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

While the increase is not a huge deal because the total is still cheaper than alternatives, the thing that irks me is how they did indeed just announce it via a blog post titled "Bitwarden launches enhanced premium plan: Complete online security for everyone". This reads like there's going to be free, premium and premium+ at best, and "we are just adding more stuff to the premium" at worst, not implying a price bump, at least to me. I did not get my renewal email yet, so can't confirm whether or not they don't even mention the annual price, but rather just the monthly one. Another thing that kind of bothers me is that they list "Vault health alerts" as a new thing, while it's always been there. While "Phishing blocker" just seems like a feature outside of the scope of a password manager.

All in all, double the price in exchange for x5 more storage and x2 more hardware keys is fine to me, but I hope they improve their communication and actually properly inform users of upcoming pricing changes.

[–] 0485919158191@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I had my renewal email come through today. Here is what is says: Your Bitwarden Premium subscription renews in 15 days. The price is updating to $1.65/month, billed annually. As an existing Bitwarden customer, you will receive a one-time 25% loyalty discount for this year's renewal. This renewal will now be billed annually at $14.85 + tax.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kepix@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

free tier is totally fine for 99% of people. if i want a cloud, i pay for a cloud. hike was totally forseeable. its an ass move tho to birry info in a blogpost noone ever read.

yeah i was like, shit 0 times 100 is 0, with a 0, carry the 0...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, not handled well. They're doing slimy corpo bullshit.

On the other hand, I like that they're open source and don't block stuff like vaultwarden.

I hope they can take the extra money and make the product better. Cuz I definitely don't love Bitwarden, but it's a better alternative than 1Password.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ransack3@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Wasn't this announced months ago? I know I heard something about it, probably on here even. Either way 20$ a year for Bitwarden is still well worth it.

[–] quaff@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Lol for years I have been wanting to switch from KeePass to Bitwarden. Mainly cause the UX/UI felt nice to me.

My initial hesitance was that I didn't love the idea of my passwords being on someone else's servers. But I found out about Vaultwarden. So I kept my eye on it's development and longevity. Now that it's well established, I'd say I trust it now. Next I figured out a way to selfhost without exposing Vaultwarden to the public. Everything seems to be lined up for me to switch.

A few months ago, I decided it was time. After moving my passwords over and getting a flow working, I went to sort by most recent.... Oh wait. You can't sort by date. You can't sort lol I sat with this for a few hours and reverted back to my trusted and working KeePass flow.

EDIT: This is one of the most voted feature requests. Also, it's just table stakes! It's crazy they don't have this feature πŸ˜‚

https://community.bitwarden.com/t/sorting-options-by-date-of-modification-addition-last-use-etc/2484

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

I kept procrastinating on self hosting it, but now i will do it tonight and migrate to my own instance.

Problem solved.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 days ago (5 children)

TBH, $10/year is a small price not to have to get my wife to change again after lastpass. She is not equipped to deal with enshittification.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The link is from February 1st, about a blog post in January. I clicked here thinking Bitwarden just raised their subscription price again haha.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 11 points 3 days ago
[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί