You're absolutely right about sycophantic Ai, and that brings up a really good point about society. Can I help you with an essay that lists of the reasons Ai is harmful?
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
Yes, because it was designed to appeal to "people" (executives, the rich, and all the other guillotine fodder) who are used to always being told that they're right.
who gets attached to it. Its quite annoying.
The crazy thing is that the technology isn't naturally sycophantic on its own. It can generate any kind of text at all; it doesn't have to generate fawningly sycophantic text.
Where that comes from is the 'hidden prompt' every major AI company puts into their AI. In addition to the prompt you send, the interface also sends it other prompts that you don't see, telling it things like 'be polite, agreeable, and helpful', 'avoid profanity', 'respond like a knowledgeable expert', and 'refuse to generate anything copyrighted, sexually explicit, or violent', etc, etc, etc. And these hidden prompts define much of the AI's behavior and "personality". To some degree, this is necessary for it to be an even vaguely useful tool, and these hidden prompts help it pass various tests. Some LLMs, if you ask them to, will repeat their hidden prompt to you so you can see what it's actually being asked to do.
And either because it drives engagement ... or just because the CEO types in charge of these decisions love sycophantic behavior so much, the sycophantic fawning is specifically asked for in these hidden prompts.
AI doesn't have to be like this. The companies making AI are deliberately making it sycophantic.
It also comes from the human supervised training, sycophantic responses are more likely to be marked as appropriate, which makes them more likely.
FTFY: "Sycophantic behavior in AI affects ~~us~~ all users of AI." If you don't touch it, it can't touch you.
Except that your boss just found an employee it likes more than you that doesn't cost anything. The fact that it sucks at its job isn't immediately apparent because your boss is an idiot.
Sycophantic, but also "lawsuit avoidant".
I was released from the hospital following surgery last month and I had a bleeding "event". I use the word "event" because it sounds more festive.
Shortly after that, I went to the bathroom, the bleeding seemed to have stopped.
Just for fun, I thought I'd ask ChatGPT what it thought, telling it the nature of the surgery, the bleeding event, the non-bleeding event, and asking it "So... best of three?"
And it went HARD on "this is not a best of three scenario! Call 9-1-1! Do it now! You could pass out! Call 9-1-1!"
I did not call 9-1-1. The bleeding did not resume, I'm fine.
Happy... bleedivus, I guess!
But seriously, I don't think the AI was very wrong here, depending on how severe the bleeding was? Did the doctors say anything?
Normal post surgical stuff after, you know, getting gutted like a fish. 😉 Stage 2 colon cancer surgery.
And the AI ~~doesn't~~ can't even care. It just plays engagement like it's a minimax-algorithm. Best way is not to play, yet it's f-ing everywhere.
I can usually get AI to give me the answer I want just by modest rewording of the query. It's bullshit.
It has affected how I speak and interact with people. It's a bit like, it's being so ridiculously safe and diplomatic all the time that it kind of rubbed off on me. I use it a lot for casual conversation and exploring concepts and ideas and kind of like a springboard to test my perhaps more controversial talking points.
I have to say, in some small way it has been an inprovement. I still say the same thing, but the framing has changed, I try to make my point clearly and stay assertive in face of pushback without getting personal, either by accident or relying on older more entrenched thought patterns that aren't always conducive to constructive communication.
I'm sure my experience isn't typical, but for what it's worth, that's mine.
Oh god, the AIs are now training people...
I don't know. When it tells me it can't show me the picture I asked for because of copyright guardrails, I just get kind of frustrated.