this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
298 points (98.1% liked)

News

29165 readers
3216 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Polish armed forces are training citizen volunteers how to be armed partisans, firing rifles and donning gas masks.

That's... not great. The program is apparently popular, so they are expanding its capacity so that every adult male receives the training.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mastertigurius@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

An attack on Poland would immediately invoke NATO Article 5, drawing in the combined forces of continental Europe, the UK, the US and Turkey. The world wouldn't need to worry about it going nuclear, conventional forces would have the Russians back over the Belarusian border by lunchtime.

[–] spongeborgcubepants@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Unfortunately that's not necessarily what article 5 implies. It only states that the member nations will respond, not how exactly they will respond.

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 1 points 56 minutes ago

Then article 42 of the EU

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I would love to believe you but looking at the sleepy AF response when Europe decided to help Ukraine...

Yeah, no, Poland is a buffer. Again.

[–] lazyViking@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Oh damn, I wasn't aware Ukraine was part of NATO

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If you think the poles won't get betrayed I have a bridge to sell you

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If Ukraine was NATO, we'd be out in all force already.

It is only because we don't have a defense treaty with them that we risk the NATO treaty if any NATO country decides to send troops. Since they are essentially deciding for every NATO country to enter the war then.

But if they attack a NATO country like Poland, then that is exact what NATO is designed for and nothing is risked.

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Mate, I am not speaking about armed response but overall response. Europe was straight up sleeping. We are underarmed and our response times suck, and historically Poland always was seen as comfortable buffer zone.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

I love your extremely oversimplified to the point of being ridiculous type response

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol -1 points 5 hours ago

Donald Tusk, it’s like some sort of a Donald Trump and Musk hybrid strain

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 17 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Canada's new Liberal government, under threat of annexation from the US, is advancing a civilian disarmament agenda.

¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 points 36 minutes ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago)

Source? I can’t find any mentions of gun control from Carney.

I know Trudeau went a bit hard on it but Trudeau’s gone

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Can't you guys just lure American forces into the woods and attack them like Ewoks?

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 14 points 17 hours ago

That's top secret defense information! We have a leak.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

It's not total disarmament, hockey sticks are effective weapons.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 50 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Drones, teach them to fly drones.

[–] IncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I just imagined a future where drones are so pervasive and advanced against current defenses, the only real defence would be a electromagnetic pulse. Even losing all other electronic means of communication, infrastructure, etc., at least the explosive and chemical weapons death swarm that was coming just fell to the ground. And guns and gunpowder will still work.
(Losing most all electricity is probably not worth the trade off, just a short thought)

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago

The stuff that the Brits recently tested is exactly an EMP pulse, though directional.

The thing is, you can harden the drones against that.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Wide dispersal EMPs are typically not that effective against smaller devices so drones with autonomous backups would be hard to effect in anything but a small area, even with a high altitude nuclear EMP.

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 2 points 12 hours ago

Thought crossed my mind.

[–] finder585@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Poles ready to defend the country if those fears become a reality? A recent poll found that only 10.7% of adults said they would join the army as volunteers in the event of war, and a third said they would flee.

Understandable, but also kind of sad. Poland exists because its people fought back against authoritarian bastards.

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, but due to gov fucking up and people struggling to make ends meet, patriotism fell a lot. Even a decade ago I'd say half of poles were patriotic and half weren't....and it fell hella lower than that.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 31 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Poland is going to be the monkey wrench in the gears for Putin's plan.

I'm big on Poland.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

They're building bases close to the Finnish border. I almost feel sorry for them, but not really.

Joking aside though, if a new front opens it's highly likely it'll be here. Our politicians are already ensuring we have a plan, and ..we'll, we do.

If they want to fight us in the forests again I don't think it'll end like Putin thinks it will, no matter if it's summer or winter.

Their drones won't be as effective, and while they may well have a larger army now than when they started that'd change pretty quickly I believe.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 10 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

russia can barely handle ukraine; they're never going to bother w europe.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing bad ever came from underestimating your enemies right?

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The same could be said for overestimating them, which can lead to defeatism.

I absolutely don’t see that as what’s happening here.

They’re simply taking a page out of Switzerland’s book, which is essentially “train literally everyone as a contingency, and make a public defense policy to bleed anyone white who tries to invade”.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

Not if Poland keeps up like they have been.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

Fuck the blyats.