this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
93 points (93.5% liked)

World News

55254 readers
2112 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"I was never swayed by NATO. I always knew they were a paper tiger, and Putin knows that too, by the way," he said, in comments published Wednesday.

How's that three day 'special operation' going? You should ask him the next time you call him. In his published comments on Wednesday, Trump again rebuked the U.K., suggesting that the country's Royal Navy was inadequate.

" You don't even have a navy. You're too old and had aircraft carriers that didn't work," he said.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (2 children)

My conservative neighbor said last week "when did he say he wanted us to leave NATO? He just wants them to pay their fair share!!"

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 47 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The Republican national sport appears to be goalpost moving.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 12 points 3 days ago

Sorry I couldn't find an NFL one.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 8 points 3 days ago

The real reason mainstream media is so unwilling to condemn rightwing nonsense is that it'd break modern physics: Rightwing goalposts constitute a perpetual motion machine. It's a global conspiracy by Big Thermodynamics.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then when he actually does leave NATO and your neighbor gets the updated talking points: "it's good that he left NATO"

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I believe he already thinks that, something like “we don’t need them“. What I have asked him is who he thinks would benefit from the US leaving NATO. The US? No. Europe? No. Russia, China? Yes. Iran? Yes. So why would we be doing that?

[–] Laser@feddit.org 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If Putin knows NATO is a paper tiger, why is he complaining about countries joining it? Why does he complain about NATO member countries on Russia's borders? Surely a paper tiger isn't detrimental to his interests? Why did they claim Russia is fighting NATO in Ukraine?

Total disconnect from reality

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

These are childish provocations. NATO is not obligated to participate in a war started by one of its members without an agreement from the others. This only works if one of their members was attacked first.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I totally know how NATO works (am former soldier from a NATO country), I know Mario is a defensive treaty and even if you're a member it doesn't mean other member nations have to cooperate with you outside of NATO related activities. So yes no NATO members need to join, and no NATO member has to support the US (even if just by allowing to use the air space) outside of NATO missions it exercises.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know Mario is a defensive treaty

Wahooooo!

[–] Laser@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

That swiping keyboard typo happens way more often to me than it doesn't

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

I haven't said that anyone should support the USA... I only stated that orange guy wants something that isn't supposed to be.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can't believe someone taught him how to use the phrase "paper tiger".

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Did they? Or did he just hear it a few times and thought it sounded like something he should say?

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

He's basically an LLM that's running on a SoundBlaster card.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

We knew Trump would eff up the US's economy, government, culture, and alliances. I think maybe we collectively underestimated how he and his zionist paymasters would screw up the entire world.

Still 35 of 48 months in his term left to go too, assuming he steps down peacefully at the end of his term, which he says he wont.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

When someone tells you who they are, believe them. Trump has told us who he is, very clearly and in no uncertain terms, and we'd better believe him. If the midterms actually go the way people are expecting them to go, I'll eat a MAGA hat (while celebrating the democratic victory) but sadly, I think people are going to be disappointed/enraged.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 5 points 2 days ago

What difference does it make? Does anyone believe the US as it stands nowadays would honour Article 5, when for once not triggered by the US itself?

[–] CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't "paper tiger" a phrase in Chinese? I don't watch a lot of trump, but I don't think I've ever heard him use that phrase...

[–] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

It's a calque of Chinese. It has come to be used so often because of 1) its obvious meaning and 2) the increase in global wars.

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

He won't. The US will loose access to all its military bases in Nato countries, including things like Rammstein as well as other military bases.

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Will they lose access to other German Metal bands, or just specifically Rammstein (wiki link)?

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

DU

DU HAST

DU HAST RAMSTEIN AIR BASE FALSCH GESCHRIEBEN

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

Both, if I have anything to say!

[–] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

He won’t.

He can't. The US entered NATO through an act of Congress; Congress has to decide if the US leaves.

[–] toad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Good. Kick out the yanks

[–] webp@mander.xyz 6 points 3 days ago

US president says he's considering pulling 'paper tiger' U.S. out of NATO

Rule of projection.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 3 days ago

Fucking please do.

[–] Alandrus_Sun@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 days ago

If it's a "paper tiger", why have we fought so hard to keep Ukraine from obtaining membership? 🤔

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

Someone told him what 'paper tiger' means, or he watched that old Alan Alda movie, 'The Paper Lion" and got it all screwed up in the translation.

[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's clear that it's in the interest of the United States to do preemptive damage control in light of tensions between RUS and EU that could escalate into a war. The Americans simply don't want to be dragged into anything, least of which conflicts they aggravated. Same logic as privatising profits and socialising losses.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Assuming how much conflicts the USA participates in last time, it will be only an improvement to the overall stability and peace of the whole alliance.