this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
364 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

83725 readers
2291 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 152 points 3 days ago

“We’ve been trying to resolve this for over a month, and getting nowhere. Support is non-existent,” Windscribe said in its post. “Anyone know a human with a brain that still works at Microsoft and can help?”

Microslop. The word is Microslop, for reasons you have just experienced first-hand.

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 85 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I did a doubletake because I read the article like 12 hours ago about VeraCrypt's dev getting locked out of their MS account, then could have sworn it wasn't Wireguard that was affected.

[–] Alberat@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago

they're both software that's can be used to protect against government surveillance

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Two bits of security software.

Makes me wonder if there's been a concerted effort to hack these accounts, and some automated security process has locked them out.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

Or maybe it's the governments dislike of VPNs being used to bypass surveillance

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago

The article mentions wireguard having similar issues, so there are probably lots of articles for each case

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 64 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'll say it; this is why age verification/developer verification is rubbish.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

Well, it's one reason it's rubbish anyhow.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 58 points 3 days ago

Another reason to never use anything bigtech.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 46 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Donenfeld, the WireGuard developer, told TechCrunch in an email: “If there were a critical vulnerability to fix right now — there isn’t! I just mean hypothetically — then users would be totally exposed.”

Well, the Windows users would. I assume that they'd still release builds for the other platforms.

I wonder if it's a coincidence that this happened right as Anthropic launched their new private LLM to find security vulnerabilities in software.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Windows is making a move to destroy my favorite type of tunnel. The only problem with that Macroslop is that I don't use them on windows machines at all. FreeBSD and Linux sure but the only thing a windows machine is good for is to be a shitty server or a workstation for those who wont learn something new.

[–] DoomBananas@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Looking at the licensing of WireGuard VPN holds the answer to the way MicroSlop prioritized this:

The kernel components are released under the GPLv2, as is the Linux kernel itself. Other projects are licensed under MIT, BSD, Apache 2.0, or GPL, depending on context.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Can't legislate VPNs out? Make it difficult to use them/install them and ultimately allow imposters to spring up.

Totally responsible environment the US is cooking up lately.

[–] VampirePenguin@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Then stop pushing updates to Windows?

Corporate infrastructure will never free you. It will turn on you.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Nire reason to move to codeberg then. Probably should've done it sooner.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

This wouldn't fix the issue. Drivers need to be signed, otherwise they won't run on Windows. Only Microsoft can sign them, it's got nothing to do with where the code is stored. They simply can't ship unsigned software.

It's like you neither read the article, nor do you understand how software works.

But otherwise I agree, fuck Microsoft and GitHub.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I believe the issue is because both VeraCrypt and Wireguard use kernal level drivers which can't run without signing, though they can be bypassed but that isn't good for security.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/install/windows-driver-signing-tutorial

Microsoft doesn't believe in good security. That is why the gatekeep like this.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 days ago

It's like you neither read the article, nor do you understand how software works.

That's a bit of a reach.