this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
237 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

83893 readers
4196 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Engineers are confident that shutting down the LECP will give Voyager 1 about a year of breathing room. They are using the time to finalize a more ambitious energy-saving fix for both Voyagers they call “the Big Bang,” which is designed to further extend Voyager operations. The idea is to swap out a group of powered devices all at once — hence the nickname — turning some things off and replacing them with lower-power alternatives to keep the spacecraft warm enough to continue gathering science data.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 13 points 1 hour ago

What a badass little craft to have kept operating for so long. 🫡

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 22 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

NASA's Voyager engineers are like the final evolution of your uncle that keeps his 1974 Chevy C/K running at 400,000 miles. It's the same autism across an ocean of resources.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 5 points 41 minutes ago

Actually basically yes. NASA has had decades of practice at minimum viable operation capability, making their spacecraft and rovers all but drag themselves along even when anything else would stop working.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

It is amazing they can detect and communicate to something with such a weak signal so far away.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 43 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

RTGs are subject to the issue of half-life - this is a consequence of that type of power source. Though, let’s be honest: we do not have any other sort of power generation technology that would be viable for literal decades on an interstellar space probe. And we definitely didn’t have a better alternative when they were launched.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

Just use two of them!

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

For roughly three milliseconds I thought to myself they shoulda used solar panels instead.

"Oh, wait...."

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Well they could power a lamp that shines on the solar panels.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

When is the next conjunction of planets that enabled the Voyager missions happening and are we preparing for it?

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 minutes ago

The Voyager mission launched in 1977. If I recall correctly, it takes roughly 80 years for the planets to realign for that purpose. If I didn't misremember, we're about halfway through waiting.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 30 minutes ago

which would shut down components on its own to safeguard the probe, requiring recovery by the flight team — a lengthy process that carries its own risks.

Uhhh... how the fuck are you planning on recovering it?

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 43 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

would be great to have some solar that would power a beacon or something if it ever entered another star system.

[–] Somecall_metim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 38 minutes ago (1 children)

Radiation and cold would have killed any electronics long before it would get to another system. And with the electronics dead, nothing would be able to tell the beacon to activate.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 34 minutes ago

it would destroy them so when heated and energized they would not work?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 2 points 11 minutes ago

Only delusion separates us from the same