this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
512 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

85110 readers
4789 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It takes most college students at least four years to earn a bachelor’s degree. Christie Williams finished in three months.

The North Carolina human resources executive spent two months racking up credits through web tutorials after work in 2024, then raced through 11 online classes at the University of Maine at Presque Isle in four weeks. Later that year, she went back to earn her master’s – in just five weeks. The two degrees cost a total of just over $4,000.

Since then, she has coached a thousand other students on how to speed through the state college, shaving off years and thousands of dollars from the usual cost of a degree.

“Why wouldn’t you do that?” Williams asked. “It’s kind of a no-brainer if you know about it.”

Many U.S. schools have been experimenting with ways to speed up traditional college programs to reduce the burgeoning cost and help students move into the workforce faster. Some offer three-year bachelor’s programs, reducing the number of credits needed for a diploma by one quarter. Many more allow students to enroll in college classes while still in high school.

But the breakneck pace of the fastest online programs concerns some academics, who say there is a big difference in what students can learn in weeks or months compared with three or more years.

The phenomenon – sometimes referred to as degree hacking, college speed runs or hyperaccelerated degrees – has spawned a cottage industry of influencers making videos about how quickly they earned their degrees and encouraging others to follow suit.

Supporters of the approach tout it as an affordable, convenient way for people to earn credentials they need for their careers. Others, including some online students and academic officials, expressed concern about what the super-accelerated students are missing, and whether a quick path devalues degrees.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HrabiaVulpes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I have several mixed opinions on this.

University is deliberately prolonged. They give you small snippets of knowledge and tell you that you need to wait a week for the next snippet, frequently with knowledge that makes sense only when you have all the pieces shown together referencing each other. And then exam at the end - it rewards people who laze through most of the course and only start learning in the last month or week before exam, turning most of the education into stamp-collecting game similar to watching a tv series (and people marathon/binge those too).

Most of the university education is also worthless on job market. 90% of knowledge you will be using in a company will be company-specific (processes, rules, tools, people) and thus not possible to gain at the university. Employers require university degree as a proof that you are able to come to the same boring, tedious place and waste your time for eight hours a day, five days a week each week. Online courses would be better off tied to specific companies rather than to degrees.

Then again I firmly believe no skill can be attained through theory alone. Not every university has practical exams, but no online course has them at all. This is, I guess, the only advantage of universities. Perhaps a hybrid system would be best? Theory can be learned at your own pace from online course, but then exams - both theoretical and practical, must be done at the physical location.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Online course generally implies online assessment.

The level of academic misconduct in those is insane; I caught 35% of my cohort cheating (using a method (one we never taught) they could not replicate in an in-person test) one year, and those were the ones I could prove. Online assessments just test what a search engine/AI knows really.

(For those about to tout "lockdown browsers"; it's called "a second laptop" or just "my phone")

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're concerned they won't be able to keep fucking people with four years of fees funded by FAFSA loans they end up defaulting on

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (9 children)

True but it's impossible to default on FAFSA loans. That stuff hangs over people until it's paid or until they die.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Some things are useful and some aren't, and colleges have a tendency to not know the difference.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My brother is a bona-fide math genius, and the summer after he graduated high school, I walked past his room, and there was a 2 foot stack of math textbooks next to his bed. I asked what that was about, and he had driven to every local library and checked out all their books on advanced math, and was teaching himself advanced trig and calc before he started college in the Fall.

When he got to school, he took a bunch of tests, and started college halfway through his sophomore year. He graduated with his bachelor's in 3 years, then got his masters in one more.

Being smart enough to get through college quickly has always been an option. Colleges today don't like it because they are more interested in the money than education.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Another reason I don't have to worry about the next generation coming for my job.

[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (17 children)

I dont know how I feel about this.

On one hand, degrees are somewhat good for education in lots of industries.

On the other hand, I would fire someone instantly if they had cheated their degree like this.

Degrees are also very expensive.

I guess if it was a useless degree then it wouldn't matter in the first place.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

On the other hand, I would fire someone instantly if they had cheated their degree like this.

But all you're doing in that case is making them attend a community college with a bunch of wacky misfits for a few years.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You won't be able to remember anything you learned if you whoosh on by. You should suffer at least a little bit from learning it, then it'll stick much better.

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

Honestly a lot of education doesn't stick either way. Repetition and living the lessons is what really makes learning stick.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›