this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
62 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

83929 readers
2482 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It takes most college students at least four years to earn a bachelor’s degree. Christie Williams finished in three months.

The North Carolina human resources executive spent two months racking up credits through web tutorials after work in 2024, then raced through 11 online classes at the University of Maine at Presque Isle in four weeks. Later that year, she went back to earn her master’s – in just five weeks. The two degrees cost a total of just over $4,000.

Since then, she has coached a thousand other students on how to speed through the state college, shaving off years and thousands of dollars from the usual cost of a degree.

“Why wouldn’t you do that?” Williams asked. “It’s kind of a no-brainer if you know about it.”

Many U.S. schools have been experimenting with ways to speed up traditional college programs to reduce the burgeoning cost and help students move into the workforce faster. Some offer three-year bachelor’s programs, reducing the number of credits needed for a diploma by one quarter. Many more allow students to enroll in college classes while still in high school.

But the breakneck pace of the fastest online programs concerns some academics, who say there is a big difference in what students can learn in weeks or months compared with three or more years.

The phenomenon – sometimes referred to as degree hacking, college speed runs or hyperaccelerated degrees – has spawned a cottage industry of influencers making videos about how quickly they earned their degrees and encouraging others to follow suit.

Supporters of the approach tout it as an affordable, convenient way for people to earn credentials they need for their careers. Others, including some online students and academic officials, expressed concern about what the super-accelerated students are missing, and whether a quick path devalues degrees.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 38 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago) (3 children)

If you can complete a masters degree in five weeks, it’s a degree mill and not a real degree. The average in-person masters degree requires 30 credit hours with 24 credits being above 500 level (graduate classes). Let’s do the math:

If you take 15 credits per semester (5 classes typically), that would be 15 hours of class time for 12 weeks. For a 3 credit class this would be 3 hours per week of class time. If you condense this down to 5 weeks, that would be 36 hours of class time per week for five weeks.

But remember, this is only half the required credits. So you have to multiply this by 2, leading to 72 hours per week of just class time.

This does NOT include any outside work. Typically, 500 level classes give homework that can take 5-10 hours per week since it is a graduate level class. Let’s assume five hours to be generous.

That would mean for a full semester (15 credit hours at 5 classes) one would be looking at 15 hours of class work per week plus 25 hours of homework/projects per week (5 classes x 5 hours of work per class). For a total of 40 hours per week.

Condensing this down to 5 weeks would multiple this number by 2.4 (5 weeks instead of 12 weeks). And then multiplying it again by 2 since you would have to do both semesters in five weeks. That would be 192 hours of work per week for five weeks. There are 144 hours in a week. These places are degree mills.

[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 17 points 35 minutes ago (1 children)

I did a summer "mini-mester" for my undergrad Fluid Mechanics class where the class was condensed into 4 or 6 weeks but you met every day and it was FUCKING BRUTAL even though I was only doing that one course. I can't imagine doing that for a full 15hrs of coursework. This smells more like a click through the classwork once randomly, figure out the right answers from the online quiz when they pop up at the end, then click the right answers the next time type of situation but for a whole program.

How this got accredited (if it actually is) is beyond me.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 6 points 21 minutes ago (1 children)

You did an intesive for fluid mechanics?! Are you insane, or a masochist?

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 5 minutes ago

He just really likes pressure.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 4 points 24 minutes ago

The problem is that many "legit" colleges are already degree mills, albeit at a slower pace. In the US at least, colleges are run like businesses. More students means more money. As long as they can maintain an okay reputation, they'll churn as many students through as they can. The places that let you fast-track like this are just taking the next logical step, and letting the mask slip a little further. The whole system is broken; this is just another symptom.

Not every institution is this way. In my area, there are one or two schools that consistently produce people who actually know something. But it's a pretty small percentage, all things considered, and I expect the overton window will gradually lessen expectations at those places over time as well.

[–] davad@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

I largely agree, but one situation I can think of where condensing the work makes sense is experienced professionals who already meet the learning outcomes. Their goal is to prove that they know the material, then have a degree to show as proof, not to actually learn the material.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 15 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

“Why wouldn’t you do that?” Williams asked

Gee, I dunno, maybe you wanted to learn something?

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 6 points 37 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago) (2 children)

forget everything you learned in college. That’s useless to you here.

Said every worker ever to every new hire.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 3 points 21 minutes ago

And every time they've been wrong in my experience. Sure there's some learning to actually apply and use it, but it's never been straight useless.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 minutes ago

In hard science degrees like chemistry and molecular biology the employer is actually milking new hires for the skills you got during your PhD, for a few years. These skills are very much not useless.

[–] Jobe@feddit.org 5 points 25 minutes ago

I wonder what fields these degrees are in...

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 hour ago

This sort of reminds me of that Kanye West School Spirit Skit about learning:

You keep it going man, you keep those books rolling 
You pick up those books you're going to read 
And not remember, and you roll man 
You get that associate's degree, okay 
Then you get your bachelor's, then you get your master's 
Then you get your master's masters 
Then you get your doctorate

You go man, and then when everybody says quit 
You show them those degrees man 
When everybody says, "hey, you're not working 
"You're not making any money" 
You say, "look at my degrees and you look at my life 
Yeah, I'm 52, so what?"

Hate all you want 
But I'm smart, I'm so smart, and I'm in school 
These guys are out here, huh 
Making money all these ways, and I'm spending mine to be smart 
You know why? 
Because when I die, buddy 
You know what's gonna keep me warm? 
That's right, those degrees