this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
270 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

83963 readers
3492 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google confirms its latest update can scan all your photos to “use actual images of you and your loved ones” in AI image generation. That means Gemini seeing who you know and what you do. You likely have tens or hundreds of thousands of photos. They’re all exposed if you update.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 11 points 56 minutes ago

GrapheneOS works great for me. Not a lot you can do on stock android that you can’t do on GrapheneOS. I would highly recommend anyone looking for privacy to look into it. Very very easy to install. Just make sure you have a Pixel phone that is unlocked. I’ve been using it as my daily driver for two years now.

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_BOOBIES@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

It's also opt in. Although I'd be surprised if anyone commenting here is actually using google photos in the first place.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Well thats just lovely

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 20 minutes ago

They weren't already doing this? I'm so glad that I downloaded all my photos and deleted them from Google Photos a few months ago with great hassle, I figured they would abuse them somehow if they hadn't already so decided to de-google.

Fuck all this shit.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 hours ago

Why search for a doctor’s appointment when Google has access to all your calendar events. Why search for a party invite when it reads all your emails. And why search for a specific photo of you and your loved ones to create an image, when it sees all your photos.

They try very hard to sell this as something positive and not the privacy invasive nightmare it is.

[–] Butterphinger@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Exactly. It's google. They're scanning EVERYTHING. Even if you don't use google, they probably know about you from OTHERS' devices who are using google.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 3 points 2 hours ago

Thanks family who insisted on digital copies.

[–] vratajin@piefed.social 19 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

That's a terrible article though and seems quite click-baity, it's hard to say what's going on just based on that.
It also says

We’re talking Personal Intelligence, Google’s latest AI upgrade path which lets users opt-in to connecting Google apps to Gemini.
If it's opt-in, it's fine, as long as the user knows what exactly they are opting in for.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Even when they say it's optional, it's never actually optional. They are always enabling it in the background and just preventing you from seeing that.

But even if they actually did use an opt-in system properly, they would still only do that for like 6 months, and then in the next update you'd be forced to use it. And who can stop them? There is no alternative.

[–] br14n@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 minutes ago

No alternative? Immich and Ente are definitely an alternative Google Photos. It ain't that hard to degoogle these days.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 35 minutes ago

You can opt out with this trendy new cocktail that will be all the rage this summer!

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 15 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

If you install immich in your homelab, you can just transfer all the images off your device very easily with the immich app.

Probably the only way to keep them private from big tech. But the long term solution is to not use the official Android or Apple systems and to root your phone and install cyanogenmod or something similar without Google apps.

But that means some apps wont work at all, so thats the price to pay for that freedom.

Or you can just buy a separate camera and stop using your phone for that.

[–] dhtseany@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 hours ago (5 children)

Immich is a nightmare to install.

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago

It was fairly easy with a docker config. What issues did you have?

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 1 points 45 minutes ago

I just ran their docker compose and it worked out of the box

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I've had zero problems installing it and exposing it on one of my subdomains via nginx. I thought it was one of the easiest things to install and configure. Like, no errors or unknowns when installing.
That being said, this isn't something the average user will be or even should be doing. Its a niche product for the tech literate, not an alternative for what cloud providers are offering. I'd not recommend it to anyone who can't tell the difference between "wifi" and "internet".

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 2 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago)

I'd not recommend it to anyone who can't tell the difference between "wifi" and "internet".

https://xkcd.com/2501

[–] TheGreenWizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe its because I used nextcloud previously but, immich felt like a breeze to install.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I can give you a docker compose that will just work if you want, as long as you have a domain name and a ingress controller running. But yes, its not easy.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 31 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Voiding my privacy, stealing my IP and opening me up to liabilities....and tis all legal... fuck all of you who gargled their balls and betrayed your own interests for what amounts to digital toys.

[–] thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 24 minutes ago* (last edited 6 minutes ago)

I appreciate the sentiment. One of the core conflicts I've had with family over the past couple decades has been their unrepentant usage of my data on these platforms. As a result, I never take or share pictures. They've responded over the years by casting suspicion on me, for not capitulating to the status quo, and for wanting to understand the nuts-and-bolts of technology. I've never shared mine nor others' data. I worked in the data economy for about a decade and still, they'd dismiss my well-founded concerns in favor of corporate propaganda and the ego-dopamine loop. "What do you have to hide?" Dumb fucks.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 12 points 6 hours ago

I thought they always did this?

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 10 points 6 hours ago

Decision to move to Immich on my own hardware years ago validated

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 30 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

I went back to Polaroid for my nudes.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 15 points 6 hours ago

I've gone even further back, having mine painted on Greek pottery

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 12 points 8 hours ago
load more comments (2 replies)

I warned most of my family and friends this was going to happen when I de-Googled and set up Immich and they all said I was paranoid.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Don't store your photos on other people's computers. Store them on your computer.

Hope this helps.

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

and what about off site backup?

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If you're willing to self-host, Immich is a fantastic replacement.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 minutes ago

Absolutely. One of the really nice things about Immich is it stores your files in a normal folder structure. Nothing obscured, very easy to backup.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Encrypted or your own device.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 7 points 6 hours ago

Thanks, I hate it!

[–] XLE@piefed.social 46 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Does it matter if you don't update? I imagine they already have it on their servers, which is where I imagine the photos are mostly processed.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 45 points 10 hours ago (13 children)

Since decades, Google Photos is cloud storage. Update or no, they already got your photos for this.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 2 points 3 hours ago

I never activated cloud storage for Google Photos. Whenever I open it for some reason, it complains about it. I need something non-shittified to go through my gallery, just haven't looked for it very much yet.

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

Unless you deny network permission for Photos, which I highly recommend.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 5 points 7 hours ago

This is why I recommend using dedicated cameras that don't connect to the web. Well, one reason, the other reason is because dedicated cameras will always outperform phone cams.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I have Fossify Gallery as my default image viewer but I'm still using the pre-installed Google camera app. Am I affected by this scanning? I haven't gotten around to checking out other camera apps.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

We’re talking Personal Intelligence, Google’s latest AI upgrade path which lets users opt-in to connecting Google apps to Gemini. Why search for a doctor’s appointment when Google has access to all your calendar events. Why search for a party invite when it reads all your emails. And why search for a specific photo of you and your loved ones to create an image, when it sees all your photos.

This is coming first to the U.S. before it rolls out everywhere else. Google assures that “bringing personal details into your images shouldn’t mean compromising on privacy, which is why our core commitments haven't changed. The Gemini app does not directly train its models on your private Google Photos library.”

But Google does say “we train on limited info, like specific prompts in Gemini and the model’s responses, to improve functionality over time.” That’s why “connecting your Google apps to Gemini remains an opt-in experience that you can adjust in your settings at any time.” It’s opt-in for a reason. Keep that in mind.

Well, I guess I'm safe for the moment.... But I also just checked and you can't prevent Google photos from accessing your files, so that's concerning....

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

It looks like I have Google Photos disabled in Settings. Maybe that helps.

load more comments
view more: next ›