this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
5 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42810 readers
222 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] colourlessidea@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Indeed, it looks as though Apple may not have to worry at all: as noted on Reddit, batteries that can maintain an 80% capacity level after 1,000 cycles aren't covered by the new rulings. Apple meets that standard, as per its official support documents, on models starting from the iPhone 15 that launched in 2023.

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 1 points 4 days ago

and even with that, recent iphones are way easier to repair than a few years ago. I would not say anyone can do it, but it’s definitely easier than before when you basically had to disassemble the whole thing

[–] HMWYSPlease@lemmy.org 1 points 4 days ago

Rewrite the rule, no exceptions, and do it for all electronics.

Literally fighting over the rare resources to make these high tech batteries and companies intentionally implement them in a way they fully know will get thrown out.

Fucking hate e-waste and planned obsolescence.

[–] ByteSorcerer@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago

I think the "80% after 1000 cycles" isn't ambitious enough. 1000 cycles is still very easy to reach, and some phones already barely last a full day when new so even that 20% lost capacity can really degrade the experience. I'd argue that it's not even an ambitious target at all, as even bog standard lithium ion batteries are frequently rated for that lifespan or more.

I could understand it if they had an exception for potential future technologies that would be pretty much guaranteed to outlast the useful lifespan of the device (such as solid-state batteries which could in theory last for tens of thousands of cycles and thus last for decades, if it is ever able to leave the lab). But as it is now with the unambitious goal of 1000 cycles so many batteries will be exempt by default that I don't think it'll change much.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago

Maybe I'm wrong, but the rule sounds fine:

In any case phones are going to last longer. The ones with replaceable batteries because you can replace the battery. And the ones with sealed batteries, because they have to compete with the replaceable ones.