this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
72 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

42810 readers
222 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You're at a coffee shop. A song comes on. It's right on the tip of your tongue. You pull out your phone, tap a button, and it tells you what it is in a few seconds.

How does a phone listen to a few seconds of music through a noisy room and instantly match it against millions of songs?

Your first instinct might be that the phone is listening to the melody or recognizing the lyrics. It's neither of those. What it's actually doing is far more clever.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kissaki@beehaw.org 7 points 2 days ago

A technical post in the Technology community, nice!

[–] DreadPirateShawn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've also noticed this is why Shazaam is shit even at a concert by the original band.

The link alludes to this when it talks about shazaam not handling us singing a song very well, but it strikes me as most stark when it's even the original artist.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I find that Google is better at identifying the song while shazam always fails at it.
Especially at more niche songs.

[–] myfavouritename@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago

I really liked this article! Thanks for the link. Gonna check out their QR Code article next

[–] bownage@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago
[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's brilliant, thank you!

They should cover JPEG compression at some point; when I first learned how that worked (at uni nearly 40 years ago... God) I was blown away by how beautiful that algorithm is.

[–] Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Better yet, JPEG and MP3 are basically the same compression algoritm.