this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
3 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33637 readers
1993 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.

~~Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion~~

Edit2: IP= intellectal property

Edit3: sort by controversal

(page 2) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if it's a moral per se, but I think nobody should be able to decline being an organ donor. It is an absolute and unforgivable waste to let bodies rot/burn when they could save someone. There is no reason, no good reason, to not be an organ donor. There is no good reason to be able, even after you're dead, to just let people needlessly die.

And religious reasons are even more moronic. What God, if you truly believe he's good and righteous and loving, would want you to let someone else die if you could save them? Why is your meat sack more important than somebody's life? Don't most people believe the soul leaves the body? It's just meat.

I've had countless arguments about this, but nobody has ever been able to give me a compelling reason as to why letting someone die to protect a corpse is right or just.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your view of god seems to be very much influenced by the Abrahamic religions.
You may not agree that it's important for the deceased or their relatives to keep the body intact until it's buried.
But there's a point to be made that this simply isn't your, or the state's, or anyone else's decision.
That only the deceased and their relatives have the right to decide that, no matter what their reasons are.

Ultimately, you're proposing that as soon as the brain stops functioning, the body of the person immediately becomes state property.
And that's a hard point to make, since everything else they leave behind usually doesn't, and all of our traditions surrounding death go against it.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

While I sort of understand your point our society already contradicts that. If a person were to die under suspicious circumstances, an autopsy would be performed regardless of the dead or any relative's wishes, and that would violate the integrity of the body as much as an organ donation would. Therefore we as a society understand that there are limits to one's personal beliefs.

I also disagree with the person you're replying to, I think the system should be opt out with the following conditions:

  • You must opt out yearly, on the 366th day since you last opted out you become an organ donor again
  • You must not have opted out of it over the past 5 years before you're allowed to undergo any surgery that would jeopardize the integrity of your body, including organ transplants but also blood transfusions and potentially also any foreign object such as pins or bone grafts.
  • You cannot opt out if you have ever received an organ.
  • Your body cannot be autopsied, embalmed or cremated, as all of those would also violate the body. This includes police investigations.
  • Any family of anyone senile/old/incapacitated enough not to be able to keep renewing it (or the person himself if possible in a moment of lucidity) can be added into the permanent no donation list.
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago

People shouldn't be jumping through hoops to conceive their own child while there are already children in need of a home

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Polygamy should be legal. If three or more consenting adults want to commit to each other, who the hell cares? Same goes for relatives in sexual relationships who aren't having kids. Like why do we care who fucks who as long as everyone is capable of enthusiastic consent?

[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

It’s legal in many countries. You might want to check out how it plays out there in terms of human rights?

[–] Paper_Phrog@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Veganism. It's interesting to see how even seemingly very moral people throw logic out the door when the topic turns to not killing animals.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Totally.

And I think the torture and abuse of non-human animals is fundamental to the treatment of human animals. When I see hegemony promoting the genocide of humans, it's obviously related to the complete devaluation of non-human life.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

Especially when it's "foodies" that pretend to have this enormous respect for food. Shouldn't these people be on the bleeding edge of things?

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 months ago

Yup. It's a moral baseline that, sadly, most people trip and fall over.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social -1 points 3 months ago

Monogamy is very often an extremely toxic factor in many relationships.

[–] wattanao@fedia.io -1 points 3 months ago

Being trans, gay, bi, black, or a different ethnicity than what is considered 'normal' in your society doesn't make you special, or less than human. I support trans rights and want to treat all humans equally on a base level. Assuming someone who looks or sounds like a woman is a woman is not transphobic, even if they are a trans man. Nor is assuming a man is straight homophobic.

At the same time, I think it's strange to introduce yourself as trans or gay in a public setting or on a social platform as if it's your calling card or occupation to be proud of. I was born with double-jointed thumbs, I don't think I should be congratulated or mocked for that, the same I don't think someone born with a man's body and a woman's brain, or otherwise decides to identify as a woman later in life, or is sexually attracted to either anything or nothing, should be given more than a passing acknowledgement.

I understand the world is cruel and harsh, and so I understand why there needs to be an LGBTQ community, but there -shouldn't- be one.

[–] Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Animals don't exist for us to use. They aren't ours. Outside of survival scenarios, it's wrong to eat animals or take things like milk or eggs from animals. It's fucked up.

load more comments (1 replies)

Anything is acceptable as a kink as long as you're careful enough and enthusiastic enough!

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

I have two.

There is no such thing as toxic masculinity or toxic femininity. There is only toxic individualism.

Sometimes, you shouldn't be yourself. The person you are might be awful. Bullying and societal pressure correcting you to a norm can be a good thing.

[–] UndergroundGoblin@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 months ago

Eating and using animals when there is a plant-based alternative is wrong and should not be done.

[–] pebbles@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago

You can't direguard anyone's humanity. Even billionaires. There are no universally bad people, negativity is always relational.

Though I do think you can weigh a billionaire's comfort against the folks they made billions from, and that may just be potent enough for the death penalty.

However, I don't think punishment is a humane solution. Rehabilitation and integration are always preferred. Though again, some folks integrate best as corpses.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›