this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
176 points (93.1% liked)

World News

55855 readers
2143 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tehWrapper@lemmy.world 300 points 5 days ago (4 children)

If you want to charge more just raise your prices.. hidden fees and extra costs should not be allowed in any billing.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 55 points 5 days ago

Especially not as a flat percentage! I could understand a cover charge, a corking fee, or a fee for substitutions, but if everything gets a 20% charge, then it's really just pretending the prices are lower and nothing else.

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

That's why I don't use food delivery services in the US. They say free delivery ect, then they add 30% to the food costs plus processing plus if you actually want your food hot. I don't mind paying for the service, but don't bullshit me like I'm a 5 years old and don't understand what you're doing. Just charge me $10 to deliver it or whatever and call it a fucking day.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I agree, but restaraunts all over the world use "hidden" ways to subsidize lower prices.

For example here in Belgium, they don't give tap water and force you to buy bad bottled water at a 300-1000% markup (so much so that beer is often cheaper) in order to be able to post lower meal prices. But people here are stingy as fuck and will in the same breath complain (and write bad reviews) about restaurant prices being more than supermarket prices as well as that "the staff is all students/not enough staff".

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 151 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Do not let this American scourge on your shores. Reject this mightily

[–] aGlassDarkly@piefed.zip -1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The scourge being the tipping custom I presume.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 1 points 4 days ago

yes, he's scottish.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 131 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 21 points 5 days ago

Put the whole hog in

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I don’t see this as tipping, more like a commission. If I don’t have to decide, it isn’t tipping. The only issue I see is it makes the items seem 20% cheaper than they actually are.

What’s the difference between a $120 check that has wages factored into menu prices and a $100 check with a $20 service charge? They’re both $120.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 89 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So he did it on New Year's Eve and 4 month later whoever is writing this article still doesn't now if it's permanent or just one time thing? Great journalism.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 45 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Welcome to 2026 where the facts don’t matter.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 20 points 5 days ago

Vibe reporting.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The headline is still true even if he only did it twice, it's still bad

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why is raising process on public holidays bad? (As long as the staff are also getting paid more)

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because the price on the menu should be what you are obliged to pay.

If they want to increase prices on holidays, they should print a menu with the correct prices.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The surcharge is written on the menu.. Printing two menus is wasteful and annoying.

Lots of places add a 10-15% surcharge on holidays here (Australia). As long as they are up-front about it, it's not that hard to do the math in your head..

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Prices must indicate what you're going to pay. These hidden costs are scummy practices and very well regulated in the EU.

Not sure what you're defending here buddy, you like paying more?

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because hiding prices in obscure surcharges is deliberately misleading customers. Given that they are surely having a special menu for the occasion they can easily print the true prices instead of fake prices. I would avoid shady places doing that. If they fool customers when it comes to paying who knows how the fool them in the kitchen.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's not hidden, it's written on the menu.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 1 points 4 days ago

Having to calculate your final price of your meal, is a hidden price. A transparent price is when you pay concrete prices for concrete services, without any x% surcharge on everything. Maybe you like it that way, but exactly that should be illegal in the EU because it serves no purpose other than making prices appear smaller than they are by having a smaller number there that is not the full price.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@piefed.social 65 points 5 days ago

Raise all your prices by 20% you fucking grifter.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 31 points 5 days ago

Anytime anyone says we should follow in the footsteps of the USA you just know it's greed

In this case it's just "I want to squeeze people but also act as if .y food isn't expensive"

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 5 days ago

Yeah. In nearly every way, the US and it's systems are a puuuuuurfect example we should all defenitely follow. Hmm hmm.

Putting the responsibility of fair wages for your employees on your customers is just a dick move. Treat your employees fairly or do the dishes yourself.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 32 points 5 days ago

Fucking twat.

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

Just raise the prices of the food if you want more money. Simple as that.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 19 points 5 days ago

I'd hope flat x % surcharges are a violation of price transperancy rules in the EU but it could be that it is possible like in the UK. But it shouldn't.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

How do I short a restaurant

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Drench their electrical board with salt water?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why don't more short sellers do that?

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Maybe it is so cheap to DIY that there is no market for pros...I guess they could sell physical pentesting, mapping and finding the board as a service, for aspiring rackateering mobsters (like tramp)... :D

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like Aussie slang. Why is naming things so easy for them?

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

that was davo at the bottlo getting his tinnies

[–] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is crazy, especially in a gastronomic restaurant where staff is paid well over market, especially for all the specialized waiter whose salary can compete with Upper middle management in tech.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Where can I read more about this?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago

between him and salt bae who also gouges people.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Or you could not come and close the door of your restaurant here.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago

Get fucked!

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As long as it is visible before you order and comes explicitly in the final bill...it is just the tabled price...they're just forcing you to take extra steps...

On the other hand...I dont want anyone bugging me to pay them extra on top of the bill, I'm not their boss.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Nah fuck that, just increase prices by 20%, this is deliberately misleading pricing and shouldn't be allowed to spread.

Infact he should get aasaice fine just to send a message!

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

yeah its like if they want put a price in parenthesis for each item to show what it will really cost. Heck show the cost of ingredients and then the cost for the service to prepare it and then the cost for service to take your order and stuff and then how much is the restaurants profit if they want full transparency.

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Doing this is different to increasing the price.

Firstly, from a PR point of view, it tells people that the extra money is going to the staff and not the restaurant.

More importantly, in the UK, we are legally able to object to a service charge placed on the bill and they have to remove it.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Doing this is different to increasing the price.

No it's not it's litterally increasing the price

it tells people that the extra money is going to the staff and not the restaurant.

They're always free to publish their books if they care about transparency.

we are legally able to object to a service charge placed on the bill and they have to remove it.

Great so assholes can get a 20% discount.

Menu prices should add up to what you are expected to pay, you don't add taxes, you shouldn't add service, those are expected functions of a restaurant, and the moment you give buisnesses an inch, they'll keep pushing until the price you pay at the end is tangential to what they list in the menu.

Your £20 main becomes £20

+20% tax

+20% service fee

+5% tip

+10% London rent fee

+5% booking fee (brought to you by Ticketmaster)

+7.2% Mercury in retrograde insurance

Which is only slightly worse than a US bill

If you want to charge me £24 just update the fucking menu!

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I do agree with you in that it’s much better for the price to be the price and for tips to be entirely up to the customer.

That’s how it is in most UK restaurants in my experience but tips being added on already is creeping in. It used to be for large groups, then smaller groups and now a few places do it for everyone. Very annoying.

Great so assholes can get a 20% discount.

You’d be being an asshole if you were just doing it on principle but I have received bad service and asked for the tip to be removed. I didn’t feel like I was being a dick.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

The service fees should only apply to people who are over a certain income level or net worth. You get a mark on your ID to show that you’re rich. No mark, no fee.